Decriminalise drug use, say experts after six-year study
Advisors say no serious rise in consumption is likely if
possession of small amounts of controlled drugs is allowed
Alan Travis, home
affairs editor, the Guardian
Cannabis: A review of
the government's appraoch to cannabis and other drugs is needed, says the
independent body that analyses drug laws.
A six-year study of Britain's drug laws by leading
scientists, police officers, academics and experts has concluded it is time to
introduce decriminalisation.
The report by the UK Drug Policy Commission (UKDPC), an
independent advisory body, says possession of small amounts of controlled drugs
should no longer be a criminal offence and concludes the move will not lead to
a significant increase in use.
The experts say the criminal sanctions imposed on the 42,000
people sentenced each year for possession of all drugs – and the 160,000 given
cannabis warnings – should be replaced with simple civil penalties such as a
fine, attendance at a drug awareness session or a referral to a drug treatment
programme.
They also say that imposing minimal or no sanctions on those
growing cannabis for personal use could go some way to undermining the
burgeoning illicit cannabis factories controlled by organised crime.
But their report rejects any more radical move to
legalisation, saying that allowing the legal sale of drugs such as heroin or
cocaine could cause more damage than the existing drugs trade.
The commission is chaired by Dame Ruth Runciman with a
membership that includes the former head of the British Medical Research
Council, Prof Colin Blakemore, and the former chief inspector of constabulary,
David Blakey.
The report says their analysis of the evidence shows that
existing drugs policies struggle to make an impact and, in some cases, may make
the problem worse.
The work of the commission is the first major independent
report on drugs policy since the influential Police Foundation report 12 years
ago called for an end to the jailing of those possessing cannabis.
The UKDPC's membership also includes Prof John Strang, head
of the National Addictions Centre, Prof Alan Maynard, a specialist in health
economics, and Lady Ilora Finlay, a past president of the Royal Society of
Medicine.
The report says that although levels of illicit drug use in
Britain have declined in recent years, they are still much higher than in many
other countries. The UK has 2,000 drug-related deaths each year and more than
380,000 problem drug users.
The 173-page report concludes: "Taking drugs does not
always cause problems, but this is rarely acknowledged by policymakers. In fact
most users do not experience significant problems, and there is some evidence
that drug use can have benefits in some circumstances."
The commission's radical critique says the current UK
approach is simplistic in seeing all drug use as problematic, fails to
recognise that entrenched drug problems are linked to inequality and social
exclusion, and that separating drugs from alcohol and tobacco use makes it more
difficult to tackle the full range of an individual's substance use.
It says the £3bn a year spent tackling illegal drugs is not
based on any evidence of what works, with much of the money wasted on policies
that are not cost-effective.
It argues that even large-scale seizures by the police often
have little or no sustained impact on the supply of drugs; that Just Say No
campaigns in schools sometimes actually lead to more young people using drugs;
and that pushing some users to become abstinent too quickly can lead to a
greater chance of relapse or overdose and death.
The commission argues a fresh approach based on the
available evidence should be tested. Its main proposals include:
• Changing drug laws so that possession of small amounts of
drugs for personal use would be a civil rather than criminal offence. This
would start with cannabis and, if an evaluation showed no substantial negative
impacts, move on to other drugs. The experience of Portugal and the Czech
Republic shows that drug use would not increase and resources can be directed
to treating addiction and tackling organised crime.
• Reviewing sentencing practice so that those caught growing
below a specified low volume of cannabis plants faced no, or only minimal,
sanctions. But the production and supply of most drugs should remain illegal.
• Reviewing the level of penalties applied against those
involved in production and supply, as there is little evidence to show that the
clear upward drift in the length of prison sentences in recent years has proved
a deterrent or had any long-term impact on drug supply in Britain.
• Reviewing the 1971 Misuse of Drugs Act so that technical
decisions about the classification of individual drugs are no longer taken by
the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD) or politicians but instead
by an independent body with parliamentary oversight.
• Setting up a cross-party forum including the three main
political party leaders to forge the political consensus needed to push through
such a radical change in approach.
Blakemore said: "Medicine has moved past the age when
we treated disease on the basis of hunches and received wisdom. The
overwhelming consensus now is that it is unethical, inefficient and dangerous
to use untested and unvalidated methods of treatment and prevention. It is time
that policy on illicit drug use starts taking evidence seriously as well."
Blakey, who is also a former president of the Association of Chief Police
Officers (Acpo), said the current approach of police taking action against people
using drugs was expensive and did not appear to bring much benefit. "When
other countries have reduced sanctions for low-level drug users, they have
found it possible to keep a lid on drug use while helping people with drug
problems to get into treatment," the former chief constable said.
"But at the same time, we need to continue to bear down on those producing
and supplying illicit drugs. This is particularly important for those spreading
misery in local communities."
Runciman said government programmes had done much to reduce
the damage caused by the drug problem over the past 30 years, with needle
exchanges reducing HIV among injecting drug users and treatment programmes
which had helped many to rebuild their lives. The commission's chair said:
"Those programmes are supported by evidence, but much of the rest of drug
policy does not have an adequate evidence base. We spend billions of pounds
every year without being sure of what difference much of it makes."
The home secretary, Theresa May, last month ruled out any
moves towards decriminalisation, saying it would lead to further problems.
She told MPs she considered cannabis a gateway drug:
"People can die as a result of taking drugs, and significant mental health
problems can arise as a result of taking drugs."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave a comment.