Secret government documents reveal vaccines to be a total
hoax
by Ethan A. Huff
If you have children, you are more than likely already aware
of the official U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
"Immunization Schedules," which today recommend an astounding 29
vaccines be given between birth and six years of age, including yearly flu
shots, as well as another five to 16 vaccines between ages seven and 18
(http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/). But a recent investigative report
compiled by Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic, Ph.D., uncovers more than 30 years of
hidden government documents exposing these vaccine schedules as a complete
hoax, not to mention the fraud of the vaccines themselves to provide any real
protection against disease.
Though her paper focuses primarily on the British health
system's elaborate cover-up of the dirty truth about its own national
vaccination program, the tenets of the study's findings still apply to
vaccination schedules in general, which are typically designed for the purpose
of serving corporate interests rather than public health. Government authorities,
it turns out, in an ongoing bid to satisfy the private goals of the vaccine
industry, have deliberately covered up pertinent information about the dangers
and ineffectiveness of vaccines from parents in order to maintain a high rate
of vaccination compliance. And in the process, they have put countless millions
of children at risk of serious side effects and death.
Hiding the truth and covering up data to encourage vaccine
compliance
vaccineThrough several Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
requests, Dr. Tomljenovic was able to obtain transcripts of private meetings
that were held between the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization
(JCVI), a so-called "independent expert advisory committee" that
makes recommendations to the government about vaccine policy, and various
British health ministers over the years. And after poring through this plethora
of information, which had previously been veiled from public view, Dr.
Tomljenovic made some disturbing discoveries.
"[T]he JCVI (Joint Committee on Vaccination and
Immunization) made continuous efforts to withhold critical data on severe
adverse reactions and contraindications to vaccinations to both parents and
health practitioners in order to reach overall vaccination rates which they
deemed were necessary for 'herd immunity,' a concept which ... does not rest on
solid scientific evidence," explains Dr. Tomljenovic in the introduction
to her paper.
"Official documents obtained from the U.K. Department
of Health (DH) and the JCVI reveal that the British health authorities have
been engaging in such practice for the last 30 years, apparently for the sole
purpose of protecting the national vaccination program."
JCVI was fully aware of MMR vaccine dangers as early as
1989, but covered them up
Beginning on page three of her report, Dr. Tomljenovic
begins outlining the sordid details of meetings held as early as 1981 where the
JCVI clearly engaged in fraud, cover-up, and lies about vaccines to protect the
vaccine industry, not children, from harm. Minutes from these meetings reveal
that the JCVI actively tried to cover up severe side effects associated with
common vaccines like measles and whooping cough (pertussis), both of which were
clearly linked at the time to causing severe brain damage in a substantial
percentage of the children that received them.
Of particular concern was how the JCVI handled unfavorable
data on the controversial MMR vaccine for measles, mumps, and rubella. 10 years
before Dr. Andrew Wakefield published his study on MMR in The Lancet, JCVI was
already fully aware that the National Institute for Biological Standards and
Control (NIBSC) had identified a clear link between MMR and vaccine-induced
meningitis and encephalitis. But rather than come forward with this information
and call for further safety assessments on the vaccine, the JCVI instead
censored this critical information from the public, and blatantly lied about
the safety of MMR for years.
"The extent of the JCVI's concerns with the
implications of scientific assessment of vaccine safety on vaccine policy
explains why they were opposed to any long-term surveillance for severe
neurological disorders following vaccination," writes Dr. Tomljenovic.
"[I]nstead of re-evaluating the vaccination policy, at least until safety
concerns were fully evaluated, the JCVI chose to support the existing policy
based on incomplete evidence that was available at that time."
In other words, the JCVI was more concerned with protecting
the reputation of the dangerous MMR vaccine, as well as many other questionable
vaccines, than with protecting children from sustaining serious injuries as a
result of getting the jabs. As far as the MMR vaccine is concerned, this
critical piece of information not only reinforces the legitimacy of Dr. Wakefield's
findings from 10 years later, which were illegitimately declared to be
fraudulent by the establishment, but also illustrates just how painfully long
this scam has been taking place.
Vaccine companies urged to manipulate data sheets, skew
safety studies to promote vaccines
If this is not bad enough, Dr. Tomljenovic also drudged up
copious amounts of information on the JCVI's longtime habit of encouraging
vaccine companies to deliberately alter their data sheets in order to make
dangerous and ineffective vaccines appear safe and effective, in accordance
with their recommendations. When the JCVI's guidance contraindications for MMR,
for instance, did not match those of the vaccine's manufacturer, JCVI
apparently instructed the manufacturer to alter its data sheets to avoid
"legal problems."
Similarly, the JCVI's official policy was to cherry-pick
unreliable studies to support its own opinions on vaccines rather than rely on
independent, scientifically-sound studies to make vaccine policy recommendations.
Once again, the JCVI's position on the safety and effectiveness of MMR is an
excellent example of this, as the group flat out ignored legitimate MMR studies
in favor of industry-backed junk studies like the infamous 2005 Cochrane
Review, which technically proves nothing about the alleged safety of MMR
because the 31 studies it evaluated did not even meet the group's basic
methodological criteria.
"Over the years, the JCVI has consistently promoted the
MMR vaccine as safe, based on studies that have been proven to be either
irrelevant, inconclusive, or methodologically questionable," explains Dr.
Tomljenovic, adding that the JCVI routinely chose to rely on flawed
epidemiological studies that only identified "association" rather
than "causation," a rather ironic inaccuracy in light of how
scrutinizing the establishment typically is of studies that contradict its own
positions.
The eye-opening, 45-page paper goes on to explain how
vaccine schedules were established through the calculated downplaying of vaccine
safety concerns and the over-inflating of vaccine benefits; the promotion of
dangerous new vaccines into the pediatric schedule through deception; the
discouraging of vaccine safety follow-up studies; and the widespread
brainwashing of the public through manipulation and scientific sleight-of-hand
tricks.
nexusilluminati
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave a comment.