Iirreversible Collapse
Dr Nafeez Ahmed… The Guardian
Nasa-funded study: industrial civilisation headed for
'irreversible collapse'?
Natural and social scientists develop new model of how
'perfect storm' of crises could unravel global system
A new study partly-sponsored by Nasa's Goddard Space Flight
Center has highlighted the prospect that global industrial civilisation could
collapse in coming decades due to unsustainable resource exploitation and
increasingly unequal wealth distribution.
Noting that warnings of 'collapse' are often seen to be
fringe or controversial, the study attempts to make sense of compelling
historical data showing that "the process of rise-and-collapse is actually
a recurrent cycle found throughout history." Cases of severe civilisational
disruption due to "precipitous collapse - often lasting centuries - have
been quite common."
The independent research project is based on a new
cross-disciplinary 'Human And Nature DYnamical' (HANDY) model, led by applied
mathematician Safa Motesharrei of the US National Science Foundation-supported
National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center, in association with a team of
natural and social scientists. The HANDY model was created using a minor Nasa
grant, but the study based on it was conducted independently. The study based
on the HANDY model has been accepted for publication in the peer-reviewed
Elsevier journal, Ecological Economics.
It finds that according to the historical record even
advanced, complex civilisations are susceptible to collapse, raising questions
about the sustainability of modern civilisation:
"The fall of
the Roman Empire, and the equally (if not more) advanced Han, Mauryan, and
Gupta Empires, as well as so many advanced Mesopotamian Empires, are all
testimony to the fact that advanced, sophisticated, complex, and creative
civilizations can be both fragile and impermanent."
By investigating the human-nature dynamics of these past
cases of collapse, the project identifies the most salient interrelated factors
which explain civilisational decline, and which may help determine the risk of
collapse today: namely, Population, Climate, Water, Agriculture, and Energy.
These factors can lead to collapse when they converge to
generate two crucial social features: "the stretching of resources due to
the strain placed on the ecological carrying capacity"; and "the
economic stratification of society into Elites [rich] and Masses (or
"Commoners") [poor]" These social phenomena have played "a
central role in the character or in the process of the collapse," in all
such cases over "the last five thousand years."
Currently, high levels of economic stratification are linked
directly to overconsumption of resources, with "Elites" based largely
in industrialised countries responsible for both:
"...
accumulated surplus is not evenly distributed throughout society, but rather
has been controlled by an elite. The mass of the population, while producing
the wealth, is only allocated a small portion of it by elites, usually at or
just above subsistence levels."
The study challenges those who argue that technology will
resolve these challenges by increasing efficiency:
"Technological change can raise the efficiency of resource use, but
it also tends to raise both per capita resource consumption and the scale of
resource extraction, so that, absent policy effects, the increases in
consumption often compensate for the increased efficiency of resource
use."
Productivity increases in agriculture and industry over the
last two centuries has come from "increased (rather than decreased)
resource throughput," despite dramatic efficiency gains over the same
period.
Modelling a range of different scenarios, Motesharrei and
his colleagues conclude that under conditions "closely reflecting the
reality of the world today... we find that collapse is difficult to
avoid." In the first of these scenarios, civilisation:
".... appears
to be on a sustainable path for quite a long time, but even using an optimal
depletion rate and starting with a very small number of Elites, the Elites
eventually consume too much, resulting in a famine among Commoners that
eventually causes the collapse of society. It is important to note that this
Type-L collapse is due to an inequality-induced famine that causes a loss of
workers, rather than a collapse of Nature."
Another scenario focuses on the role of continued resource
exploitation, finding that "with a larger depletion rate, the decline of
the Commoners occurs faster, while the Elites are still thriving, but
eventually the Commoners collapse completely, followed by the Elites."
In both scenarios, Elite wealth monopolies mean that they
are buffered from the most "detrimental effects of the environmental
collapse until much later than the Commoners", allowing them to
"continue 'business as usual' despite the impending catastrophe." The
same mechanism, they argue, could explain how "historical collapses were
allowed to occur by elites who appear to be oblivious to the catastrophic
trajectory (most clearly apparent in the Roman and Mayan cases)."
Applying this lesson to our contemporary predicament, the
study warns that:
"While some
members of society might raise the alarm that the system is moving towards an
impending collapse and therefore advocate structural changes to society in
order to avoid it, Elites and their supporters, who opposed making these
changes, could point to the long sustainable trajectory 'so far' in support of
doing nothing."
However, the scientists point out that the worst-case
scenarios are by no means inevitable, and suggest that appropriate policy and
structural changes could avoid collapse, if not pave the way toward a more
stable civilisation.
The two key solutions are to reduce economic inequality so
as to ensure fairer distribution of resources, and to dramatically reduce
resource consumption by relying on less intensive renewable resources and
reducing population growth:
"Collapse can
be avoided and population can reach equilibrium if the per capita rate of
depletion of nature is reduced to a sustainable level, and if resources are
distributed in a reasonably equitable fashion."
The NASA-funded HANDY model offers a highly credible wake-up
call to governments, corporations and business - and consumers - to recognise
that 'business as usual' cannot be sustained, and that policy and structural
changes are required immediately.
Although the study based on HANDY is largely theoretical - a
'thought-experiment' - a number of other more empirically-focused studies - by
KPMG and the UK Government Office of Science for instance - have warned that
the convergence of food, water and energy crises could create a 'perfect storm'
within about fifteen years. But these 'business as usual' forecasts could be
very conservative.
Dr Nafeez Ahmed is executive director of the Institute for
Policy Research & Development and author of A User's Guide to the Crisis of
Civilisation: And How to Save It among other books. Follow him on Twitter
@nafeezahmed
This article was
amended on 26 March 2014 to reflect the nature of the study and Nasa's
relationship to it more clearly.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave a comment.