Gnostics, Annunaki/ Archons
& The Reptilian Agenda
& The Reptilian Agenda
by John Lash
In response to Dan Brown’s reference to the Nag Hammadi
texts as scrolls, “They are codices – books with individual pages. They are
actually the oldest example we have of leather-bound books.”
Amazingly, whatever the significance of their content (and
we have just barely begun to comprehend what that might be), the Nag Hammadi
Codices (NHC) are rare original artifacts, the earliest surviving examples of
bound books.
A close reading of these arcane materials shows that
Gnostics were deeply concerned with alien intrusion into human affairs. The
entities they called Archons appear to be identical to the ET’s of modern
Ufology. Both Grey and Reptilian types are explicitly described in the codices.
I would estimate that up to one-fifth of the core material in the NHC concerns
the Archons, their origin, methods and motives.
'The Sophia Mythos,' the Gnostic creation story, explains
that the Archons arise due to an anomaly in the cosmic order. “The world system
we inhabit came about by a mistake.” (The Gospel of Philip)
This startling line alludes to the Gnostic theory that the
solar system was produced by the impact of the goddess Sophia upon lifeless
atomic matter, but the Earth was formed from Sophia’s divine, alive, self-aware
power.
Odd as it sounds, this view is totally compatible with
modern astronomy. We know that the solar system at large is dominated by
inorganic chemistry and does not support life as it occurs in the biosphere,
where organic chemistry is the norm. Gnostics would argue that this is so
because the Earth is the embodiment of Sophia, while the solar system is the
product and habitat of the Archons. The observation of this difference between
the inorganic and organic aspects of our solar system led James Lovelock to
formulate the Gaia Hypothesis.
So, the earliest surviving books contain a description of
Alien intrusion, but what about the earliest known writings? Archeologists tell
us that cuneiform writing was invented in Mesopotamia around 3200.
The cuneiform record gives us the most extensive repertoire
of stories about human prehistory. Cuneiform texts such as Atrahasis, Enuma
Elish, and Enki and World Order, present stories of a non-human race called the
Annunaki, “those who from heaven to earth came,” as Zecharia Sitchin translates
that term.
Sitchin is known for densely researched books on the
Annunaki, whom he identifies with the Biblical Nefhilim, “the Watchers” of the
Book of Enoch. These are alien entities who “came into the daughters of men,”
as Genesis says.
The story of the Annunaki describes how an alien race
intervenes deeply in human evolution. Sitchin and others accept this plot as if
it were an actual record of events in prehistory.
 |
| Mesopotamian Gods and Goddesses |
Hence, an alien “interbreeding program” is central to the
Annunaki narrative. It is an indisputable fact that this story is written down
in the oldest surviving records, but is the story itself a fact?
Both the oldest writings and the earliest books tell us the
same story. Isn’t this amazing? To my knowledge, little or no attention has yet
been given to this odd “coincidence.”
However, there is a world of difference in the way the story
is treated in these two sources. The cuneiform record tells the intervention
scenario as if it were (pre)historical fact, a set of events that really
happened.
In the NHC, the story of the Annunaki (Archons) is
introduced in a cosmological perspective, and then it is analyzed. In other
words, the Gnostics had a view of the cosmic origins of the Annunaki, and they
also took a critical approach to intervention.
The cuneiform record is just a story, without critical
commentary. The description of alien interbreeding occurs in both cases, but
the NHC tell us the attempt failed:
“The Archons came to
Adam. When they saw Eve talking to him they said to each other, ‘What sort of
creature is this luminous woman?’ … Now come, let us lay hold of her and cast
our seed into her, that she may become soiled and unable to access her inner
light. Then those who she bears will be under our charge… But Eve, being a free
power, laughed at their decision. She put mist in their eyes [and escaped
them].” (The Origin of the World, 116)
This is one of several NHC passages that show Eve outwitting
the Archons. It presents a mythological event, and comments on the outcome of
that event.
In the Gnostic view, the Archon/Annunaki do attempt to
interbreed with humanity, but fail. Other texts describe how Eve leaves her
“phantom image” which the Archons defile, but they are unable to actually
access her body, i.e., human genetic structure.
The “Reptilian Agenda” is a modern interpretation and
extension of the Sumerian cuneiform story, but it ignores the Gnostic version
of that story, and the critical commentary. Sitchin’s weak points are his
inability to present a convincing case for the origin and motives of the
Annunaki, and his failure (or refusal) to describe their physical appearance.
Most ET theorists who follow him assume the Annunaki are
Reptilians: for instance, R. A. Boulay in 'Flying Serpents and Dragons' (an
excellent book, by the way, and more deeply researched than Sitchin in some
ways).
The entire Reptilian Agenda stands or falls on how we view
the cuneiform accounts, the oldest version of the alien intrusion plot.
But who wrote the cuneiform stories? The answer is, scribes
in the service of the Sumerian theocrats. This answer is not complete, however,
because scribes write things down, they do not originate what they write.
Who then originated the cuneiform intervention stories taken
down by scribes? I propose that it was soothsayers and advisors in the service
of the theocrats. No ancient court was without a psychic channeller, if not a
whole team of them.
If we assume the critical distance of the Gnostics, we can
understand how psychics advising the theocrats would produce a story to fit the
need of their masters: specifically, the need to see themselves as descendents
of “gods” and, at the same time, as slaves )albeit privileged ones) to a higher
race that claims to have produced them. This message is schizophrenic, and as
such it is totally consistent with channeled material and the mentality that
produces it.
If the cuneiform stories are the product of psychic
channeling in ancient times, the Reptilian Agenda, the modern elaboration of
those stories, needs to be entirely reexamined in the light of Gnostic Archon
theory.
The first step in confronting the Reptilian menace, whatever
it is, is to set the story straight.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave a comment.