Multiple Paths Lead To One World Government
by Martin Edwards, Mike Robinson
That we live in a world of “Agenda Politics” is absolutely
clear. Governments come and go, but the agenda never changes. Policies left
incomplete by one government are taken up with gusto by the next. Civil
servants get involved in writing party manifestos.
One of the most obvious of the agendas that our politicians
are pushing is that of “World Government”. The British Parliament is now
subservient to so many foreign bodies and institutions it is hard to keep
count.
This is not a new agenda. It has been pushed since before
the twentieth century by, among others, the “rat pack” of the Huxleys, H.G.
Wells, Bertrand Russell and the like. And it finds its expression in a host of
organisations, “think” tanks, NGOs and committees.
The most obvious example of those organisations, of course,
is Julian Huxley’s United Nations.
It was Franklin Roosevelt who first coined the term “United
Nations”. His vision, however, was for a forum of sovereign nations; a world
apart from what the United Nations has become.
Perhaps a less obvious path to world government is the
Commonwealth, and a question which has long been on our minds is, which is the
path which is most likely to get us there?
A hint came in July 2010, when the Queen addressed the UN
General Assembly. She said:
This September,
leaders will meet to agree how to achieve the Millennium Development Goals when
each nation will have its own distinctive contribution to make ... Since I addressed
you last, the Commonwealth, too, has grown vigorously to become a group of
nations representing nearly two billion people. It gives its whole-hearted
support to the significant contributions to the peace and stability of the
world made by the United Nations and its Agencies. Last November, when I opened
the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Trinidad and Tobago, I told the
delegates that the Commonwealth had the opportunity to lead. Today I offer you
the same message.
The implications of this are staggering. Here, the British
monarch is telling the world that she is creating the largest power bloc within
the United Nations; a power bloc with 54 votes, compared to the single vote of,
say, the USA, Russia or China.
Contrary to rumour, the British Empire never went away.
Commonwealth nations never, in reality, obtained independence from Britain.
Instead, they simply went through a process of devolution; home rule instead of
direct rule. Puppet presidents and prime ministers to replace Viceroys and
Governors.
In any case, the British Empire was never really about
Britain, and has certainly never been about the British people. It was, and
remains, a corporate financial “empire”; an international trading empire based
on the looting of nations and the trafficking of drugs. For a while, that
corporate infrastructure was effectively nationalised, and took on the
appearance of being a British political empire, rather than a corporate
financial one.
After the second world war, however, “empire” became unfashionable.
It was time to move to the next phase of the globalist agenda, so the empire
shrunk into the shadows. The colonies were restructured and the embryonic
institutions of World Government were formed.
Today it has raised its ugly head above the parapet once
again with renewed vigour, and once again, we stare into the jaws of a now
truly global, corporate, communitarian monster.
A Return To Feudalism
The apex of the pyramid of feudal power is the monarch. In
Britain, our monarch and her family get involved in a wide range of activities,
some commercial, some not. One area the British Royal Family has been involved
in is environmentalism, particularly so-called “Sustainable Development”.
Both Prince Philip and Prince Charles push the idea that
humanity is a parasite on the face of the earth; Philip perhaps a little more
openly since he has expressed his desire to be reincarnated as a virus which
would solve what he views as the global population problem.
Nonetheless, both father and son head up the global
environmental push for massive depopulation, limiting of technology except
where it oppresses and limiting access to natural resources.
Prince Philip’s World Wildlife Fund is directly responsible
for the deaths of many, many people through it’s interference, for example,
with irrigation programmes right around the world which would feed millions.
But it is Prince Charles’ Prince of Wales International
Business Leaders Forum which, along with the IMF, World Bank and the United
Nations have really been pushing the sustainable development policy, including
the UN’s “Agenda 21”.
Agenda 21
Agenda 21 is a term which has mostly been dropped these
days. Too many people became too aware of what it was - a modern form of
feudalism.
Agenda 21 designed a global movement, coordinated through a
global to local action plan to create world government in accordance with
certain objectives. Let’s look at some of its key policy objectives:
populations to be
concentrated in cities
an end to national
sovereignty
the abolition of
private property
the restructuring
of the family unit and increasing limitations on mobility and individual
opportunity
Now, consider the policies coming out of our own government:
the systematic
destruction of our farming industry
an end to national
sovereignty European and UN “laws” applied at the local level - the “Big
Society”
private property
and assets stripped away through economic hardship and crippling taxes
children stolen by
the state and pushed into a multi billion pound care system
0-19 education
programmes (schools opening longer, no parental influence)
crippling public
transport costs and soon to be imposed road charging
So while the term “Agenda 21” has been dropped, the policies
it represented absolutely have not. They have simply been transformed into the
Big Society and the Millennium Development Goals. The agenda remains, and at
its heart is the drive for world government.
Let’s look again at what we said about Agenda 21 above - “a
global movement, coordinated through a global to local action plan”. A key
facet of that action plan is to push the agenda down to the most local levels
in society.
One mechanism for achieving that has been the absolute
destruction of our education system. The inability of our teachers to teach has
nothing to do with their capability as teachers, but rather the imposition of
ever more ridiculous processes and procedures, which bar them from teaching
effectively. The deliberate dumbing down of entire generations of children
guarantees that those children will grow up as more “sustainable” human beings,
because stupid adults earn less and therefore consume less. Stupid adults are
incapable of recognising delphi technique when it is being used upon them.
Stupid adults are incapable of understanding the lessons of history, or of
Shakespeare.
But stupid adults still need leadership, and it is through
the massive increase in “leadership” training that the world government agenda
is being implemented. As stated above, the apex of the pyramid of feudal power
is the monarch. Historically, the military stronghold from which such power was
wielded was the castle. One such stronghold is Windsor Castle.
Windsor Castle is home of the Windsor Leadership Trust. St
George’s House College states that:
Through a unique
portfolio of programmes and consultations, held at St George’s House, Windsor
Castle, we provide opportunities for leaders to develop their own leadership
wisdom and insight. Leaders from all sectors take part, including business,
government, military, religion, and not-for-profit.
St George’s House was founded in 1966 by H.R.H. The Duke of
Edinburgh and the then Dean of Windsor, Robin Woods, as a place where people of
influence and responsibility in every area of society can come together to
explore and communicate their views and analysis of contemporary issues.
The website of the World Bank contains a page dedicated to a
‘Leadership Program: Windsor Meeting, July 2007. It reads:
Following consultations on the establishment of a Global
Leadership Initiative (GLI) to generate support – globally - for leadership
development interventions, a second meeting of the core group for the
Initiative (GLI) took place in Windsor, UK, from July 8 to 10 2007.
Organisations represented at this meeting were UNDP, DfID, CIDA, the Windsor
Leadership Trust, and the World Bank (PRMPS and WBIGP).
All meetings at the Windsor Leadership Trust are held under
the Chatham House Rule which the majority of UK Column readers would associate
with Julia Middleton’s Common Purpose.
Connections Between The Monarchy, Common Purpose And The
United Nations
The Windsor 2012 Annual Lecture held on Monday 28th May this
year was given by Assistant Commissioner Cressida Dick QPM, of The Metropolitan
Police.
Dick was the policewoman in charge of the operation that led
to the death of Jean Charles de Menezes, mistaken for a suicide bomber at
(London’s) Stockwell tube station,
According to the response to a Freedom of Information request by the
Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) dated 8th September 2008, Deputy Assistant
Commissioner Cressida Dick attended a training course run by Common Purpose
whilst serving with Thames Valley Police (TVP).
Researchers have also discovered that Dr. Kate Ardern MB
ChB, MSc , FFPH, Executive Director of Public Health for the Borough of Wigan,
and graduate of Merseyside Common Purpose (1999) is also an Alumnus of the
Windsor Leadership Programme with which she has an ongoing involvement.
In ‘Developing Tomorrow’s Leaders, CBI Guide to Leadership’
by Prof John Adair (published by Windsor Leadership Trust in September 2007):
Public leadership
programmes should be used selectively. Their chief value is to get managers out
of their corporate silos and cross-fertilising with managers from a wide
variety of organisations. Recommended programmes in this context include those
of the Windsor Leadership Trust, the Whitehall and Industry Group, the Campaign
for Leadership and Common Purpose.
In 2009 John Adair was made United Nations Chair of Strategic
Leadership. Based in Turin, he has launched a strategic leadership programme in
association with the UN.In Chapter 1 of her book ‘Beyond authority: Leadership
in a changing world’’ Julia Middleton, CEO Common Purpose writes:
Society needs
leaders who can overcome the silo problem inside their organisation – and then
move across different spheres of activity outside it and connect them too.
Then, perhaps, we can start to shift the ‘silo problem’ in society as well.
Amongst the Windsor Leadership Trust Movers and Shakers
Autumn 2011 we discover Oliver Mack, WLP February 2001 now Chief Operating
Officer at Common Purpose.
The Windsor Leadership Trust supports the Clore Leadership
programme. The Clore Leadership programme is supported by Common Purpose. The
relationship between these organisations is incestuous in nature.
According to Linkedin Doug King LVO MA is Assistant Private
Secretary to The Queen. He is a Common Purpose 20:20 graduate and Windsor
Leadership Trust Alumni.
CSC Leaders
Windsor Leadership Trust is not the only training
organisation that Prince Philip has set up, however.
According to the Linked In Page of Sam Stewart, Plymouth
based Director of CSC Leaders and ex-regional director of Common Purpose, CSC
Leaders:
will assemble 100
of the most exceptional individuals from across the Commonwealth with the
purpose of tackling challenges that business, governments and society face
today and build global relationships needed by the leaders of tomorrow .
CSCLeaders is the renewal of HRH The Duke of Edinburgh’s Commonwealth Study
Conferences and represents a partnership between HRH The Duke of Edinburgh’s
Commonwealth Study Conferences (UK Fund) and Common Purpose, the international
leadership organisation operating in 18 countries which has been giving people
the inspiration, skills and connections to become better leaders both at work
and in society for over 21 years. The Duke of Edinburgh’s Commonwealth Study
Conferences were first initiated by HRH The Duke of Edinburgh ... The Conferences
have continued to run every six years or so, hosted by a different Commonwealth
country.
World Government Via The UN Or The Commonwealth
Our research has led us to conclude that the Commonwealth is
well on its way to becoming the key power bloc leading us to World Government,
via the United Nations. It would appear that the question is not whether one or
the other will take us there, since both are. As for who is pushing the agenda,
so far all paths lead us back to the British Crown.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave a comment.