Bradley Manning and the Gangster State
By Chris Hedges
Fort Meade, Md.—The swift and brutal verdict read out by
Army Col. Judge Denise Lind in sentencing Pfc. Bradley Manning to 35 years in
prison means we have become a nation run by gangsters. It signals the inversion
of our moral and legal order, the death of an independent media, and the open
and flagrant misuse of the law to prevent any oversight or investigation of
official abuses of power, including war crimes. The passivity of most of the
nation’s citizens—the most spied upon, monitored and controlled population in
human history—to the judicial lynching of Manning means they will be next.
There are no institutional mechanisms left to halt the shredding of our most
fundamental civil liberties, including habeas corpus and due process, or to
prevent pre-emptive war, the assassination of U.S. citizens by the government
and the complete obliteration of privacy.
Wednesday’s sentencing marks one of the most important
watersheds in U.S. history. It marks the day when the state formally declared
that all who name and expose its crimes will become political prisoners or be
forced, like Edward Snowden, and perhaps Glenn Greenwald, to spend the rest of
their lives in exile. It marks the day when the country dropped all pretense of
democracy, obliterated checks and balances under the separation of powers and
rejected the rule of law. It marks the removal of the mask of democracy,
already a fiction, and its replacement with the ugly, naked visage of corporate
totalitarianism. State power is to be, from now on, unchecked, unfettered and
unregulated. And those who do not accept unlimited state power, always the road
to tyranny, will be ruthlessly persecuted. On Wednesday we became vassals. As I
watched the burly guards hustle Manning out of a military courtroom at Fort Meade
after the two-minute sentencing, as I listened to half a dozen of his
supporters shout to him, “We’ll keep fighting for you, Bradley! You’re our
hero!” I realized that our nation has become a vast penal colony.
If we actually had a functioning judicial system and an
independent press, Manning would have been a witness for the prosecution
against the war criminals he helped expose. He would not have been headed,
bound and shackled, to the military prison at Fort Leavenworth, Kan. His
testimony would have ensured that those who waged illegal war, tortured, lied to the public, monitored our electronic communications and ordered the gunning down of unarmed civilians in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Yemen were sent to Fort Leavenworth’s cells. If we had a functioning judiciary the hundreds of rapes and murders Manning made public would be investigated. The officials and generals who lied to us when they said they did not keep a record of civilian dead would be held to account for the 109,032 “violent deaths” in Iraq, including those of 66,081 civilians. The pilots in the “Collateral Murder” video, which showed the helicopter attack on unarmed civilians in Baghdad that left nine dead, including two Reuters journalists, would be court-martialed.
testimony would have ensured that those who waged illegal war, tortured, lied to the public, monitored our electronic communications and ordered the gunning down of unarmed civilians in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Yemen were sent to Fort Leavenworth’s cells. If we had a functioning judiciary the hundreds of rapes and murders Manning made public would be investigated. The officials and generals who lied to us when they said they did not keep a record of civilian dead would be held to account for the 109,032 “violent deaths” in Iraq, including those of 66,081 civilians. The pilots in the “Collateral Murder” video, which showed the helicopter attack on unarmed civilians in Baghdad that left nine dead, including two Reuters journalists, would be court-martialed.
The message that Manning’s sentence, the longest in U.S.
history for the leaking of classified information to the press, sends to the
rest of the world is disturbing. It says to the mothers and fathers who have
lost children in drone strikes and air attacks, to the families grieving over
innocent relatives killed by U.S. forces, that their suffering means nothing to
us. It says we will continue to murder and to wage imperial wars that consume
hundreds of thousands of civilian lives with no accountability. And it says
that as a country we despise those within our midst who have the moral courage
to make such crimes public.
There are strict rules now in our American penal colony. If
we remain supine, if we permit ourselves to be passively stripped of all
political power and voice, if we refuse to resist as we are incrementally
reduced to poverty and the natural world is senselessly exploited and destroyed
by corporate oligarchs, we will have the dubious freedom to wander among the
ruins of the empire, to be diverted by tawdry spectacles and to consume the
crass products marketed to us. But if we speak up, if we name what is being
done to us and done in our name to others, we will become, like Manning, Julian
Assange and Snowden, prey for the vast security and surveillance apparatus. And
we will, if we effectively resist, go to prison or be forced to flee.
Manning from the start was subjected to a kangaroo trial.
His lawyers were never permitted to mount a credible defense. They were left
only to beg for mercy. Under the military code of conduct and international
law, the soldier had a moral and legal obligation to report the war crimes he
witnessed. But this argument was ruled off-limits. The troves of documents that
Manning transmitted to WikiLeaks in February 2010—known as the Iraq and
Afghanistan “War Logs”—which exposed numerous war crimes and instances of
government dishonesty, were barred from being presented. And it was accepted in
the courtroom, without any evidence, that Manning’s release of the documents
had harmed U.S. security and endangered U.S. citizens. A realistic defense was
not possible. It never is in any state show trial.
Manning’s lawyer, David Coombs, read a brief statement from
the 25-year-old after the sentencing:
The decisions that
I made in 2010 were made out of a concern for my country and the world that we
live in. Since the tragic events of 9/11, our country has been at war. We’ve
been at war with an enemy that chooses not to meet us on any traditional
battlefield, and due to this fact we’ve had to alter our methods of combating
the risks posed to us and our way of life.
I initially agreed
with these methods and chose to volunteer to help defend my country. It was not
until I was in Iraq and reading secret military reports on a daily basis that I
started to question the morality of what we were doing. It was at this time I
realized that (in) our efforts to meet the risk posed to us by the enemy, we
have forgotten our humanity. We consciously elected to devalue human life both
in Iraq and Afghanistan.
When we engaged
those that we perceived were the enemy, we sometimes killed innocent civilians.
Whenever we killed innocent civilians, instead of accepting responsibility for
our conduct, we elected to hide behind the veil of national security and classified
information in order to avoid any public accountability.
In our zeal to
kill the enemy, we internally debated the definition of torture. We held
individuals at Guantanamo for years without due process. We inexplicably turned
a blind eye to torture and executions by the Iraqi government. And we stomached
countless other acts in the name of our war on terror.
Patriotism is
often the cry extolled when morally questionable acts are advocated by those in
power. When these cries of patriotism drown out any logically based dissension,
it is usually the American soldier that is given the order to carry out some
ill-conceived mission.
Our nation has had
similar dark moments for the virtues of democracy — the Trail of Tears, the
Dred Scott decision, McCarthyism, and the Japanese-American internment camps —
to mention a few. I am confident that many of the actions since 9/11 will one
day be viewed in a similar light.
As the late Howard
Zinn once said, “There is not a flag large enough to cover the shame of killing
innocent people.”
I understand that
my actions violated the law; I regret if my actions hurt anyone or harmed the
United States. It was never my intent to hurt anyone. I only wanted to help
people. When I chose to disclose classified information, I did so out of a love
for my country and a sense of duty to others.
If you deny my
request for a pardon, I will serve my time knowing that sometimes you have to
pay a heavy price to live in a free society. I will gladly pay that price if it
means we could have a country that is truly conceived in liberty and dedicated
to the proposition that all women and men are created equal.
We will pay for our criminality. We will pay for our
callousness and brutality. The world, especially the Muslim world, knows who we
are, even if we remain oblivious. It is not Manning who was condemned
Wednesday, but us. “Under a government which imprisons any unjustly,” Henry
David Thoreau wrote, “the true place for a just man is also a prison.” And that
is the real reason Bradley Manning is being locked away. He is a just man.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave a comment.