The Great Forgetting
By Phila Hoopes
The Great Forgetting refers to the wealth of knowledge that
our culture lost when we adopted our new civilized lifestyle. The knowledge
that allowed indigenous cultures to survive, the knowledge that we had once
also been tribal and the understanding that we were but one mere culture of
thousands. All of this disappeared in a few short generations.
The Great Forgetting accounts for an enormous cultural
collapse as once tribal people found themselves in a new and strange mass
centralized society. New beliefs, new ways of life rushed into this cultural vacuum to fill the void. But without being tested by natural selection over
thousands of years this new culture was evolutionarily unstable.
It is only recently that the Great Forgetting has been
exposed. Understanding it holds the key to making sense of our destructive
culture. And remembering what it is that was forgotten holds the key to our
future.
How The Great Forgetting Took Place
It began around 10,000 years ago when one culture in the
Near East adopted a new way of life that humans had not tried before. Agriculture
They began to practice an intensive form of agriculture
which enabled them to live in a settled location.
They developed large food surpluses which led to a
population and geographic explosion. What began as farming communes eventually
turned into villages, then into towns, and then kingdoms.
But it was a long time before anybody began to write down
history, several thousand years later in fact. What happened in between was
that the people of this culture forgot what had happened. They forgot that they
once were hunter gatherers and foragers who lived a
nomadic lifestyle. They assumed that mankind arrived on the planet at the same time as civilization. They assumed that civilization and settled agriculture was the natural state of mankind, as natural as living in a herd and grazing is to buffalo.
nomadic lifestyle. They assumed that mankind arrived on the planet at the same time as civilization. They assumed that civilization and settled agriculture was the natural state of mankind, as natural as living in a herd and grazing is to buffalo.
Naturally this gave rise to the belief that we were only a
few thousand years old, that mankind had began when civilization began.
The primitive cultures that lived on the fringe areas of
early civilization would appear to suggest that humans had lived another way.
But they were easily explained away. They had fallen from the natural state of
civilization; they had degraded into savagery. They had once lived as fully
fledged humans but they had forgotten the way and now they were inferior, they
were sub-human.
The Philosophical Roots of Our Culture
This collective cultural memory lapse; this belief that
humans had arrived in the world as civilization builders was held by the
foundation thinkers of our culture.
The philosophers, historians and theologians of the ancient
civilizations: Sumer, Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, India and China wove the Great
Forgetting into their work.
Those that followed – the Hebrew authors of the Bible,
Moses, Samuel, Elijah, Isaiah and Jeremiah, the great Western thinkers,
Socrates, Plato and Aristotle and the great Eastern thinkers Lao Tzu, Gautama
Buddha and Confucius - all wove the
Great Forgetting into their work.
The thinkers of more modern times also followed suit, they
didn’t take any Great Forgetting into account. Why would they? They had no
reason to believe that humans had not come into this world as civilization
builders. They had no reason to believe that this wasn’t our natural state. So
Thomas Aquinas, Francis Bacon, Galileo Galilei, Isaac Newton and Rene Descartes
carried on our culture with the Great Forgetting at its root.
The Truth Is Revealed
Palaeontology exposed the Great Forgetting. Palaeontology
made it clear that mankind had not arrived on Planet Earth when civilization
emerged. We had lived for a very long time, millions of years in fact, in a
completely different way. Mankind hadn’t fallen from the natural state into
primitive living. That was how we began.
Looking back on it one could assume that the exposure of the
Great Forgetting would have been a momentous discovery. It should have shook
the very foundations of our way of thinking, the very foundations of our
culture. One could have assumed that this would have led to some fundamental
changes about who we are and how we should live.
But it didn’t. The Great Forgetting just got explained away.
Instead of admitting that two very different and legitimate ways of living had
been adopted by mankind in his history the thinkers of the 19th Century came up
with this: man may have been born into this world as a primitive savage but he
was destined to become a civilization builder.
In essence they said: “Who cares that we didn’t arrive as a
civilization builder. It was our destiny to become a civilization builder. Now
that we are here who cares what went before us. Those people that lived before
us were just a precursor to us. They weren’t important.”
We didn’t arrive
as a civilization builder. But it was our destiny to become one.
The historians came up with a convenient way to disregard
those humans that walked the earth those millions of years before our culture
emerged.
Instead of accepting that they were part of history the
historians relegated them to pre-history. They were before history, because
history began when civilization began. We are the good stuff; we are the ones
who are fulfilling the destiny of mankind. We are the ones who should be
studied.
The Myth of the Agricultural Revolution
Our culture’s transition from hunter gatherer to
civilization builder was also explained away. The term our thinkers coined was
“The Agricultural Revolution.”
This is how it was explained: Before the agricultural
revolution humans didn’t know how to farm or how to practice any kind of
agriculture. They lived as hunter gatherers and foragers. Once they discovered
farming they were then able to settle down and build civilization. The
agricultural revolution was the foundation from which all the greatness of
humanity stems.
It was explained in such a way that leads us to believe that
the agricultural revolution was:
Something that
happened more or less by everybody.
Something that
happened more or less at the same time.
The story is told so we think that one group of people
figured it out and those nearby saw what they were doing and thought “aha what
a better way of doing things, what a better way of living.” Once a group was
enlightened with the knowledge of agriculture they immediately stopped their
primitive hunting and gathering ways and settled down to practice the better
way. They could see that this was man’s destiny and they eagerly took it up.
This myth has permeated our culture since the 19th century
thinkers created it to support their idea that civilization is the divine
destiny of mankind. However the agricultural revolution was not a revolution
and it had absolutely nothing to do with agriculture.
Agriculture had been practiced in many different ways and
forms by thousands of different cultures around the globe. Agriculture is not
unique to civilization. What is unique to civilization is a particular form of
agriculture, that Daniel Quinn terms totalitarian agriculture.
Totalitarian agriculture subordinates all life forms to the
relentless single minded production of human food. It is the belief that the
whole world is ours by right and we should turn all of the land into human
food.
This generates huge surpluses which generates rapid
population growth and rapid geographical expansion.
Through sheer weight of numbers totalitarian
agriculturalists overrun neighbouring regions obliterating other cultures and
their way of life. The agricultural revolution wasn’t something that started
and finished thousands of years ago. It is still happening today, being driven
forward by our cultural doctrines which tell us that the earth is a foe that
must be conquered.
The agricultural revolution wasn’t about humans finding a
better way to live. It was about a single culture out of thousands beginning to
live in a way that only worked through exponential growth. Civilization didn’t
spread because it was a good idea. Civilization spread through force. The
exponential growth of the totalitarian agriculturalists displaced anybody and
everybody else. It wasn’t a revolution; it was an experiment that became a
runaway train.
Read more about this here:soulpathsthejourney.org
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave a comment.