A Unified Theory of Evolution –
How Karma & Reincarnation Complete Darwinism & Intelligent Design
How Karma & Reincarnation Complete Darwinism & Intelligent Design
By Frank Huguenard
In 1859, when Charles Darwin published his landmark
manuscript on the theory of evolution, On the Origin of Species, the book
generated a firestorm of controversy and still today the debate between
scientists and Creationists seems to be more contentious as ever. According to
Darwin’s theory, the basic mechanism of evolution consists of two major
components; random mutations and natural selections. And we’re led to believe
that all of the magnificent beauty and wonder we see in nature is due to random
mutations. The platypus notwithstanding, Mother Nature’s exquisite precision
and diversity would appear to be too fine and too staggeringly perfect to be
simply relegated to random chance and survival of the fittest.
On the other hand, the original proponents of the
Intelligent Design theory were typically theologians who understood that The
Book of Genesis couldn’t be considered a scientifically viable explanation for
the vast amount of life forms on Earth, but wanted to posit a viable
Creationist’s alternative to Darwin’s theory of evolution.
And while Darwinists use science to discredit the story of
Adam and Eve and how God created the Universe six thousand years ago,
Creationists also have a great deal of scientific evidence that discredits many
of the main tenets of Darwin’s original theory. Debunkers of Darwin’s theories
are quick to point out mistakes in his overall concept without taking into
account that he was a pioneer in his field 165 years ago when he published his
book, and, that advances in science have filled in some of those mistakes. But
what if both theories are correct, and both are incorrect? In other words, what
if there was a unifying theory of evolution that satisfied both camps of
thought?
Darwin’s Theory of Evolution, which was published as an
entire book under the title of On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural
Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life is significantly more comprehensive than just
a discourse on natural selection and random mutations. Amongst the many
chapters are theories on how microbial life originated on the planet billions of
years ago, how land mammals could become whales and dolphins and discussions of
a Universal power behind the marriage between science and religion and how The
mystery of Mysteries, evolution, follows some sort of cosmic laws.
Of the many controversies surrounding both theories, one of
the biggest lingering mysteries is something that neither theory adequately
addresses, which is how does the mechanism of animal and plant instincts
actually work? From the smallest single celled organism to human beings, there
is obviously an incredible amount of intelligence passed along from one
generation to the next. Is it possible that this is something that is simply
stored in the life form’s DNA or is there something beyond the physical realm
that is communicating information to the plant or animal?
One of the most amazing stories about animal instincts is
the 7 generation lifespan of a Monarch Butterfly family. Each spring, Monarchs
begin the annual migration pattern away from a small mountain range in Mexico
and begin their journey up north. Each successive generation flies 400-500
miles, lays eggs and dies. The eggs are hatched, the caterpillars mature and
become butterflies, only to carry on the northward flight. Approximately the
7th generation however, eats differently and saves all of it’s energy for the
2500 mile flight back to the very exact same tree their great, great, great,
great grandfather left many months earlier. How can this much information, with
the precision of a GPS device, be retained after 7 generations of insects no
larger than the size of a leaf?
Neither Darwinists nor Intelligent Design proponents can
begin to explain the answer to this question using their respective theories.
However, researchers like Bruce Lipton in the field of epigenetics and Rupert
Sheldrake and his theory of morphogenic fields and many others are beginning to
postulate that a component of consciousness is at play here. However, neither
of these theories really begins to provide an explanation for how plants and
animals have evolved on this planet. And Andre Linde, whose theories regarding
the Big Bang were recently validated, has stated that he believes that
consciousness will become part of Scientific Law within the next 100 years,
paving the way for a unification between science and spirituality.
The bridge between Darwin’s theory of Evolution and the
theory of Intelligent Design begins to be constructed when you incorporate the
concepts of karma and reincarnation into the overall equation of evolution.
Even if you are a non-believer in either karma or reincarnation, the inclusion
of the two ideas into the overall mechanism for either theory of how life
developed on this planet automatically begins to resolve the question marks.
The mystery of how such an incredible amount of diverse and perfect life forms
developed on this planet from primitive microbial life starts to be revealed.
According to the science of Vedanta, when a person is
conceived, 50% of the impressions on their consciousness come from their
parents and 50% come from their previous birth. This explains why children from
the same mother and father can have such radically different physical and
psychological traits. Of course, this type of equation could never be proven
(or more to the point, disproven) using the Modern Scientific Method and so
it’s difficult for westerners to move on from here. This intellectual obstacle
could also be compared to the square root of negative one, otherwise known as
an imaginary number: since no number multiplied by itself can result in a
negative number, the square root of any negative number can’t exist, so they
are called ‘imaginary’.
However, mathematicians and scientists commonly use
imaginary numbers and irrational numbers to solve complex equations which
couldn’t possibly be solved any other way. Coincidentally, Schrödinger’s famous
Wave Function, which is a centerpiece of Quantum Mechanics, was resolved using
the square root of negative one. In much the same way, karma and reincarnation
(which some scientists would argue as being irrational) can be used to resolve
the complexity of the mechanism behind evolution. Operating under the assumption that half of
an organism’s instincts (or karma) comes from their parents and half comes from
their previous birth, you can begin to formulate a model that explains how all
of brilliantly diverse plant and animal species on Earth has come into
existence.
When you stop to consider that it wasn’t random mutations
that drove evolutionary change, but rather programmed DNA modifications coming
from an epigenetic blueprint based on information stored in the consciousness
of the organism from both its previous birth and its parents, you mold a new
paradigm of evolution that incorporates some of the Intelligent Design concepts
along with Darwin’s theories.
According to Vedanta, the design, the designer and the
designed are all one, which implies that there is merit to the Intelligent
Design theory but what advocates for the Intelligent Design theory are not
factoring in to their position is the idea that the entire cosmic dance has not
been an overall design created billions of years ago, but a vibrant and dynamic
river of change that is an everlasting intermingling of the seen and the
unseen. Between the manifest and the un-manifest.
About the Author
Frank Huguenard is an author, teacher and documentary film
producer, specializing in films on Science and Spirituality. You can see all
three of his films, Beyond Me, Beyond Belief and Beyond Reason at his website www.beyondmefilm.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave a comment.