Crop Glyphs: Allowing for Hope?
Daniel Rozman
There are currently 6492 crop glyphs documented and archived
Their proliferation and evolution in design has escalated radically over the
past quarter of a century. The phenomenal spirit of the glyphs has charmed the
bullish, the meek, and all personalities between – thousands who have
undertaken cross-thematic studies from their point of reference, from the
standpoint of their professional background. Yet the murciriality of crop
glyphs remains, and in climactical frustration a shroud of common denial has
cast a shadow over that which would otherwise illuminate. For those who have
avoided the trap of coyness, and treat the glyphs with significance, miracles
have ensued.
Crop Glyphs have made their mark worldwide, but the
concentration of the most evolved glyphs has occurred amidst the fields of
England’s Wiltshire Triangle, which extends to Avebury, Stonehenge and
Glastonbury. There are several features to this specific geography that are
worth mentioning since they inform (even if only partially) the reason for
glyph placement.
Geologically this area sits atop a vast aquifer. Research
undertaken by Glenn Broughton in the 1990s showed that 94.6% of all crop glyphs
occurred above underground water. This one observation makes an interesting
point of study for anyone who concerns her/himself with the relational dynamics
extrapolated by Tesla from his study of the Giza Pyramids. The energy of
charged water beneath the Earth’s surface might be harnessed to project the
impression on the compliant crop(s).
Additionally, the glyphs’ most common and deliberate
placements are in close proximity to ancient sacred sites – monuments that have
endured for millennia – for instance Silbury Hill and the West Kennet Long
Barrow.
In 2005, Andreas Muller interviewed Credo Mutwa, who said in
significant revelation that:
“What you call Crop
Circles is the same that what the Zulu call Izishoze Zamatongo and which means
the designs or the writings of the gods. We have known about them for more than
4,000 years.”
Mutwa, the great Shaman, went on to state that the hundreds
of thousands of megalithic structures (which Michael Tellinger is bringing to
our attention at apace) were indeed stone monuments placed to venerate – in a
worldly permanence – these very designs. This explanation would go a long way
to explaining why England’s crop glyphs share so many similarities of geometric
proportion, alignment and relationship, with the enigmatic henges of the area.
An immediate charm of the glyphs is found in their visual
style, sympathetic to the self-organising fractal patterns of nature. As such, their
designs, if studied (as has been done by the likes of John Michell, John
Martineau & Michael Glickman), almost always offer mesmerizing sacred
geometry extrapolations, and regularly clarify the definition of principles
such as the golden ratio and squaring the circle – to name but a few.
To call something sacred is but another way of identifying
something as eternal. The guiding force of God’s Universe would see that if
something fell from the stars that thing (animate or inanimate, tangible or
etheric) could find an immediate affinity with those things it interacts with
on Earth. So to define sacredness, is to define eternity; only harmony can
remain in such truthful perpetuity – not taking but simply being, and so always
giving.
An artist would distinguish their practice by speaking about
the medium through which they choose to communicate. In this case, the mark is
left on a canvas of rolling fields nestled in wondrous vales. One might argue
that theirs is an imposition on commercial crops, but has anything in the world
with which we now interact not been appropriated and assigned an ownership
designation? Nature’s natural product is being hurriedly tampered with in order
to proliferate distortion feed and command patent-ability. The medium of that which
sustains us (crop) and speaks to the future (seeds) should only be found to be
upright. In the author’s opinion, in conceptual reflection the crop glyphs
couldn’t present themselves in a more provoking medium.
Studies in the late ‘90s, collated by Nancy Talbott,
demonstrated that the harvest yields associated with the affected fields were
often boosted in statistical significance – almost as if to innately compensate
in the language of commodity trade.
Furthermore, according to studies undertaken by the
biophysicist William Levengood, seeds that had matured by the time of
formations landing, would germinate to delivered boosted returns – again.
Hence, uprightness has always been championed by this benevolent phenomena,
their innocent impressions upon the rural landscape indicative of that which we
might do well to revere once again.
The exhibition can be admired in person during a seasonal
window beginning with Spring’s renewal and the culmination of Summer, again
speaking to the cyclical nature with which we as a mass consciousness have
become detached, to our own detriment.
When one holds barricaded, contemporary visual arts up
against artistry found in the fields, there is simply nothing with as much
innovation, context, concept, composition, scope for philosophical deduction,
nor sheer humbleness.
We would do well to let go of any emotional attachment
associated with the common argument of criminal damage, and let others try and
reconcile this case against a backdrop of watchful farmers and (to date) no
prosecutions. Those who would claim it a prolific art form do not ask why over
the course of decades, in spite of their prolificness, not a single artist has
claimed the art – or at the very least documented a significant commentary to
substantiate their practice, which is otherwise left vulnerable to the hoards
that scoffed. These are conundrums that many seek to unravel, and in so doing
are determined to remain rooted at square one. It is, as all misinformation, a
simple trick that leaves the intellect paralyzed by its own projected illusion.
The glyphs appear in golden fields, but much like the fabled
El Dorado, these represent a city of gold associated with fruitful gifts
serving the individual soul journey. Its endowment, a platform-acceleration and
hence little relation to boosting the entrenchment of egotistical accolade, ie.
man’s first sin – pride.
On the ground, social persuasions exhibited by visitors and
researcher alike are comparable to an amplified school dynamic. The bright ones
seek approval from authority, the quiet ones arrive at their own conclusions,
and the bullies fragmenting the harmony to the point of their own exhaustion,
or boredom – whichever tames them first.
It is thought-provoking to obverse that crop glyphs are
known as crop circles, and formations. To experience crop circles firsthand is
often to undertake a (trans/in)formative experience.
Raising our aura, is a function of interaction with chosen
(powerful) locations in nature and the subliminal messages of the glyphs that
are reawakening those capacities, which would aid us (not painlessly) to
restore our individual presences. Those who stick around for more than a
fleeting glimpse, often share accounts of inexplicable familiarity. Almost as
if echoes of our future (and past) lives reverberate throughout the
inter-personal experience. There is a strong case to be made for Crop Glyphs
acting like a beacon for soul clans to be united in space and time by a
unifying image projection. Indeed dozens (over the years, thousands) of visitors
travel cross-continent by an indomitable compulsion, and far from the daily
influences that may will the further distortion of our original design.
Evolution has been studied, to varying degrees of
authenticity and applicability. Yet there is an unavoidable common conclusion
that perceived evolutionary steps have been fast, and occurred in the pattern
of a step-change. There is a case to be heard that Humanity has degenerated to
the point of confronting an abyss, and hence the best remedy would be an
applied step-change in consciousness expansion. Perhaps it is here already,
tapping us on our shoulder and asking; do you want it? Just as children are
never an imposition but always a graceful opportunity to deliver us to a place
which cannot be discovered by pursuing expectations. Maybe the soul clan
dynamic is geared for us to realise that we are one, to take on different roles
– as masterfully depicted in Cloud Atlas.
The Glyph, and the Soul phenomena is a mystery that humanity
has not got to grips with, but this fact is not one to be regarded in
self-perceived inferiority. Rather we are allowed to marvel, to observe and on
occasion learn outside the artificial constraints of an academic ‘fixed law.’
We are allowed to observe its ebbing and flowing, like the oscillations of our
gravitational field or the speed of light. To accept the wisdom that we can
only be as aware of that with-out, as we are that with-in. Just as Alan Watts
once said, the Godhead cannot ever be in full awareness of itself, and so we
will never be in full knowledge of the crop glyphs, even if an ultimate truth
is there for the taking.
Conventionally respected disciplines have studied the glyphs
with applied intellect too. PhDs, their radars, magnetometers and surveying
equipments all these are only as appropriate as their specialty. The exotic
energy which creates many of the formations, is applied by a sentience
comparable with the teacher nudging, encouragingly us the observer students
(willing or not). As with any such equivalent, the symptom will invariably not
hasten one to the source. Nor explain through the prism of conventional
reasoning – how could the limiting web of lower consciousness, intellectual
entrapment rationalise with man-made logic why these glyphs appear within a matter
of moments, fully formed and without revealing the hand of their conceptor(s).
Hence, one might truly resort to the belief that we are
being instructed to explore and develop our crypticised senses? That can be
unlocked through our metaphysical interaction in the fields, or by merely
giving an applied attention to their designs.
So what does this say about the experience; is it
transcendent; is it transformative; is our interaction with them truly
personal? For some, the glyphs will simply reintroduce a person to nature, and
compel them to define those senses which are there and theirs but otherwise in
neglected stasis. For others they might lead to a series of events, which reach
into the astral realms and give nutrition to the rest of their experience. It
might cause some to confront personal denials and to finally break emotional
attachments with those aspects of life that are not serving a higher good, and
thereby leading us to serve others too. Countless other things, beyond
definition, are possible too – and deserving of an excitement stemming from
taking personal responsibility. Continued in wakingtimes
About the Author
Daniel Rozman is the author of the metaphysical novel
Transition (2013); he has published over fifty articles on www.cropcirclecyclist.com,
and is speaking at the Summer Crop Circle Lectures (UK) this July.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave a comment.