How to Wake People Up Without Being an A-hole
By Phillip J. Watt
It’s fair to say that all of us don’t know what we’re
talking about when it comes to specific topics. We might have excellent
awareness in some areas, but next to none in others. Yet whenever we read the
comments section of anything controversial on Facebook or elsewhere, there are
always the various opposing views, many of which are ignorant, condemning and
outright abusive. The disheartening aspect is many people who have awoken to
some of the conspiratorial ‘truths’ that have been brilliantly exposed by the
independent media, as well as run a relatively good heart program, can still be
some of the most ignorant bullies out there.
From a personal standpoint, we should all be able to
recognise that we’re learning everyday. Sometimes we might even have strong
convictions about particular beliefs, but if we’re adamant about conducting
holistic and robust research, we’ll inevitably find that we have gotten
something strikingly wrong.
If unbiased and deep investigation has been a process that
we have engaged in for many years, it would no doubt be a less common
occurrence. Still though, it’s clear that we need to stay open to not just
evolving our views, but entirely transforming that which we ‘believe’ we
‘know’. Otherwise, we’ll inescapably fall subject to falsity, dogma and
bigotry.
In this light, it’s important to engage people with opposing
or varied views through not just healthy debate, but conversation too. If we
head into a discussion with the attitude that we’re only out to ‘win’, then
what are the consequences if we’re wrong? Will we be shut off from developing
our own perspective and therefore behave in ways that resemble the mainstream
mentality? Of course we would be.
The community of awakening individuals is on the right
track, but let’s be real about it; most people who are only just beginning to
stir from their slumber have very little idea of what they’re talking about.
This is obviously even more applicable to the sleeping masses as well.
When we first begin to wake up to the greater realities of
our existence, we only have a very limited perspective on the entire spectrum
of concepts and knowledge that constitute the truth and sovereignty movements.
And even though there are many people who have been engaged in this process for
decades, even they will still have it wrong in some ways.
This awakening spectrum can be thought of as two distinct
categories; on one side is opening to the spirituality of reality, and on the
other lies the lies of the economic and social structures. Some of us are waking
up in both areas, whilst others only explore one of the two.
For example, many people who understand the propaganda and
mechanisms of the control-matrix reject anything of a spiritual nature. This is
unfortunate because there is so much to be learned from exploring the
consciousness of reality and its deep interconnection on an ecological, quantum
physical and symbolic level.
It adds magic to the madness, which speaks volumes of good
vibrations to the heart and mind.
The same goes for those who have tapped into some of the
bigger philosophical realities. Many have completely lost their sense of
direction when it comes to navigating their way through the monetary,
medicinal, political, educational and other social structures which have been
hijacked by the corporatocracy that has long established the core control of
how human affairs are organised on a global scale.
Unfortunately, some prefer to keep their head in the sand
and just ‘secretly’ hope that everything will work out okay without them
needing to activate their inner activist and contribute to the many growing
grass-roots movements which have sprung up all over our world. This is not only
imbalanced, but hypocritical too.
Of course there are many deceptions which are either
purposely or mistakenly created within both areas, too. For example, the new
age movement is plagued with false ideology that steers people off track. In
all fairness though, there are many essential ‘truths’ woven within it, so it’s
an amateur mistake to throw the baby out with the bath water once we see
through the haze.
This also applies to the orchestrated infiltration of our
social systems. One example is that there are differences in opinion for who
the men behind the curtain actually are, as well as what is the ‘right’ way to
move forward in terms of an economic and social model. Regardless of the truth
about these issues – which really is impossible to definitively ascertain – its
important that we all unite under the simple agreement that the money supply
and the matrix-media are the two primary control mechanisms that we need to
educate people on and address first.
We also need to be active in building self-sustaining
systems on a local and community level too, which unfortunately very few people
have stepped up to actualise.
Another example is the infighting over the US presidential
race, as well as whether the political system can be used to our advantage or
not. One thing that is indisputable among all this noise is that this circus
has been beneficial to the cause because many people are becoming more
conscious through the commentary provided by Trump and Sanders. This stands,
even if the political duopoly has always been an effective divide and conquer
strategy employed by the powers-that-will-no-longer-be.
Let’s not get too lost in the details about the candidates
either; let’s just accept that Hillary is a puppet of the establishment and
that it’s a good thing that Trump and Sanders have had the opportunity to tell
their stories.
It is in this sense that the political arena has been
conclusively shown to be an effective vehicle to wake up the sleepwalking
masses. In this light, one day it might even be able to be used to solidify the
real change we need for real freedom and justice. We’re obviously not there
yet, but we very well might be if we capitalised on the power we have as a
collective.
Of course we are all anarchists at heart; we all covertly or
overtly desire the freedom from being ruled (which for those who don’t know is
the true definition of anarchy). Excessive government and dictatorships are not
and never will be the answer to anything positive and productive. Yet the logic
of using politics as a mechanism at the very least to educate the masses, as
well as one day re-instituting our natural and sovereign rights, is crystal
clear.
Plus, the nuclear and other weaponry that exists these days
needs to be kept in check; without some sort of management system the
psychopathy of unmonitored collectives of people will inevitably kill us all.
Simply, there has always been tyrannical structures and monopolies which have
manifested all throughout human history, so once again we need a platform to
ensure that we undermine the powers-at-be-now, as well as guarantee it doesn’t happen
into the future.
In summary, the struggle for freedom is an ancient journey
so we shouldn’t overlook the fact that the political framework has actually
brought some positive results. We should capitalise on it to continue this
agenda, instead of completely condemning it just because it’s not working
perfectly in this moment. If we recognise that a balanced approach is always
the right approach, then we can recognise the value in working within the
system to achieve our goals, as well as building on the outside too.
In any case, that’s my personal view, and hey, I accept that
I might be wrong. And even if I am, that doesn’t mean that I deserve to be
abused over it. I used this example because regardless if we’re talking about
as something as complex as this issue, or something more mundane, we definitely
need to take a more respectful approach towards each other.
Unfortunately, this is not a common reality online. If we
look at any forum which discusses politics, the failed war-on-drugs,
conspiratorial information or many other divisive topics, then we’ll see a
plethora of ignorance and abuse that really is an embarrassment to the fight
for truth and freedom.
For example, even if we are aggressively approached by a
highly indoctrinated mindset that is still in the fantasy land of the
mainstream mentality, then meeting abuse with abuse gets no-one anywhere fast.
If we’re direct and real, but still show a bit of compassion for their
delusion, then we might actually be able to help them understand the illusory
predicament they’re in.
This also goes for those who have a lot of intellectual
capacity, but still have their head in the sand about the way the world really
is; if we can subtly help them to understand that the brainwashed-expert quota
has already been filled, then everybody wins.
And of course the same goes for those we meet who are on the
same team of truth and freedom; it might be us or it might be them who needs to
evolve our view, so if we’re each open to the developmental path, then we’re
all likely to learn and grow from the experience.
Simply, we don’t need to be an asshole about it. We all had
to begin the waking up experience at one stage so its hypocritical if we are.
Plus, it just doesn’t work anyway, so let’s put our pride to the side and
engage our fellow truth-seekers (even if they don’t know it yet) in a way
that’s going to maximise their chance of emancipating themselves from their
psychological prison.
Ultimately, bullying and abusive behaviour is a disgrace to
those who consider themselves as ‘waking up’. We should always be real, direct
and assertive – that should never change – but we should also take a serious
chill pill and be sympathetic to the ignorance of others, as well as our own. After
all, nobody has all the answers.
About the Author
Phillip J. Watt lives in Australia. His written work deals
with topics from ideology to society, as well as self-development. Follow him
on Facebook or visit his website.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave a comment.