Who Was Moses?
By Robert Temple
When people are spoken of constantly, we feel we know them.
Christians and Jews have been talking about Moses for thousands of years, so
they assume they know who he was. But is this an illusion? Is it possible that
no one really knows who Moses was? That the evidence about him is contradictory
and enigmatic? Is it even possible that he never existed except in fable?
Even religious fundamentalists have an immediate problem
with Moses, and the accounts of him in the biblical Book of Exodus. People who
fanatically believe that every word written in the Bible or the Torah is
somehow ‘the word of God’, ‘written by God’, or ‘inspired by God’ (these claims
vary and are rarely defined with any degree of precision), are faced with
serious contradictions in the biblical text itself.
Near the beginning of Exodus, God speaks to Moses from a
burning bush at Mount Horeb in Sinai and tells him to go back to Egypt. So
Moses, not wishing to be impolite to an unknown entity who has spoken to him
from a burning bush in no uncertain terms, duly begins to travel to Egypt as
instructed. But what happens next? Suddenly we are told in Exodus, Chapter 4,
24-27:
During the journey, while they were encamped for the night,
the Lord met Moses, meaning to kill him, but Zipporah [the wife of Moses]
picked up a sharp flint, cut off her son’s foreskin, and touched him with it,
saying, “You are my blood-bridegroom.” So the Lord let Moses alone. Then she
said, “Blood-bridegroom by circumcision.”
Can anybody explain what is going on? Here the supposed
‘Word of God’, i.e., the Bible, says the entity calling himself God instructs
Moses to drop everything and rush off to Egypt, and then the same entity meets
him on the way with the intention of killing him. This homicidal impulse is
however appeased by Moses’s wife grabbing a sharp flint and circumcising her
son and claiming that he is her bridegroom. This all sounds more like an
incident from a really bad Hollywood horror movie. And as for the actions of
Zipporah, it is more like the kind of thing one might expect at a voodoo rite
in Haiti than what one would expect from the wife of such a reputedly sober
character as Moses, who is on a mission to Pharaoh to persuade him to “let My
people go.”
As for “the Lord” so-called, he seems capricious at best and
a homicidal maniac at worst. There is no need for us to assume, as so many have
uncritically done for millennia, that “the Lord” of Moses had anything whatever
to do with God. The world is full of paranoid schizophrenics who hear voices
and believe that ‘God has spoken’ to them. If all of these people were to be
believed, there would be tens or hundreds of thousands of ‘Gods’.
In order to try to figure out more about this puzzling
episode from the Bible, I turned to a volume I have in my library which is a
commentary on Exodus published by a biblical scholar named A.H. McNeile. He
says:
The narrative in these three verses appears, from its
contents, to be one of the oldest portions of the Bible. Its antiquity is shewn
[sic] by the use of the flint knife, and by the part circumcision plays
according to the belief of the actors.
McNeile then goes on to add that the text really says of the
foreskin that she “made it touch his feet,” but he says that is a conventional
euphemism of the time which really means touching her “pudenda,” i.e. her
genitals.
If we are to believe this remarkable bit of information, we
are faced with the undignified magical scene of the superstitious wife of Moses
circumcising her son and pressing his bloody foreskin to her vagina and
pronouncing him her bridegroom, or as McNeile translates her words: “A
bridegroom of blood art thou, because of the circumcision.”
For some reason not explained at all, Yahweh is appeased by
this and decides not to murder Moses after all. I ask any rational person: is
such a Yahweh to be identified with ‘God’? Do all the people who attend church
and synagogues seriously believe that ‘God’ wanted to murder Moses on his way
to Egypt but was appeased by this tawdry bit of superstitious magic?
The confusion over the true nature of Moses probably reached
its most extreme form at Petra. Many tourists have now visited the amazing
enclosed city of Petra in modern Jordan, which is reached by passing through a
narrow crevasse in a cliff face. It is one of the surviving archaeological
wonders of the world. Epiphanius of Salamis (who lived circa 310/320 CE – 403
CE) recorded in his book The Panarion, sometimes known as his book Against
Heresies:
The profundities and glories of the sacred scripture, which
are beyond human understanding, have confused many. The natives of Petra in
Arabia [modern Jordan], which is called Rokom and Edom, were in awe of Moses
because of his miracles, and at one time they made an image of him, and
mistakenly undertook to worship it. They had no true cause for this, but in
their ignorance their error drew an imaginary inference from something real.
I wonder how many tourists going to Petra realise that they
are going to the only place in the world where Moses was worshipped as a god.
That’s not something you would be told by your tourist guide!
In the second century BCE, a Jewish playwright named Ezekiel
lived at Alexandria in Egypt, and he wrote a drama in the Greek style called
‘The Exodus’, in which Moses was the leading character. This play survives only
in extended fragments preserved by Eusebius (circa 263 CE – 339 CE) in his book
The Preparation for the Gospel, which he took from an earlier historian named
Alexander Polyhistor. The text of the play is largely lifted from the Bible,
with flowery language and interpolations, as shown by this monologue by Moses:
Ha! See! What sign is this from yonder bush?
A marvel such as no man might believe.
A sudden mighty fire flames round the bush,
And yet its growth remains all green and fresh.
What then? I will go forward, and behold
This wondrous sign, that passes man’s belief.
From this, we can see that Ezekiel was no Shakespeare, and
his task was a simple one, to dramatise the story of the Book of Exodus in a
straightforward and rather unsubtle manner for the stage, so that the Gentiles
of Alexandria could have the Jewish legends presented for them in an outdoor
theatre. It was a bit like producing a soap opera for mass television, but it
was two thousand years ago. One does not read anything about this play in the
histories of the theatre, but it deserves a mention. It was probably much less
corny than Cecil B. DeMille’s film about Jesus, ‘King of Kings’, which I had to
sit through several times at the Roman Catholic school I attended as a child
(an experience which helped put the finishing touches to my lack of affection
for the Catholic Church).
The Staff into Snake into Staff Trick
Children who read the Bible always remember the vivid
incident where Moses throws his staff on the ground before Pharaoh and it
becomes a snake, and then he picks the snake up and it becomes a staff again.
Actually, this is how we remember the tale but in fact the Bible says that
Aaron, not Moses, does this before Pharaoh. In Exodus 4, “the Lord” and Moses
have this dialogue: Moses answered, “But they will never believe me or listen
to me; they will say, ‘The Lord did not appear to you.’” The Lord said, “What
have you there in your hand?” “A staff,” Moses answered. The Lord said, “Throw
it on the ground.” Moses threw it down and it turned into a snake. He ran away
from it, but the Lord said, “Put your hand out and seize it by the tail.” He
did so and gripped it firmly, and it turned back into a staff in his hand.
“This is to convince the people that the Lord the God of their forefathers, the
God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, the God of Jacob, has appeared to you.”
(4:1-6)
Later, the story of the snake continues in Book 7: The Lord
said to Moses and Aaron, “If Pharaoh demands some portent from you, then you,
Moses, must say to Aaron, ‘Take your staff and throw it down in front of
Pharaoh, and it will turn into a serpent.’” When Moses and Aaron came to
Pharaoh, they did as the Lord had told them. Aaron threw down his staff in
front of Pharaoh and his courtiers, and it turned into a serpent. At this,
Pharaoh summoned the wise men and the sorcerers, and the Egyptian magicians too
did the same thing by their spells. Every man threw his staff down, and each
staff turned into a serpent; but Aaron’s staff swallowed up theirs. (7:8-13)
Even though this seems one of the most unbelievable stories
in the Bible, it is curiously enough one of the most convincing (and hence, a
source of encouragement regarding the veracity of some of Exodus), because this
was a genuine trick of Egyptian magicians which was recreated in the twentieth
century.
The way this trick is done is by means of ‘animal hypnosis’,
or animal catalepsy. I described the use of the trick by Moses in my book Open
to Suggestion, which was published in 1989. However, the book was only
published in Britain, and readers in the USA never saw it. My book was an
extremely long survey of worldwide hypnosis research, compiled by me over a
period of 15 years. It also contained a survey of 150 years of documented case
histories of the criminal abuses of hypnosis. My book so alarmed the hypnosis
community and various security agencies (especially my sections on mind control
and mass hypnosis), that every effort was made to suppress the book.
Eight American publishers to whom the book was submitted
sent my agent identical letters from two referees (always the same two men in
each case, whom I knew personally and strongly disliked) warning them that the
book would be a public danger, and they must not publish it. The two referees
were not distinguished clinicians or experimentalists, they were functionaries
whose job it was to liaise between the security services and the hypnosis
community.
They succeeded admirably in their task, which was to prevent
the American public from ever reading such things as this revelation which I
made: more than fifty percent of the hypnosis experiments carried out in the
United States have been carried out by the government and are classified as top
secret. You can understand why my book was considered seriously ‘uncool’ by
various grim persons.
Read more of this here:
newdawnmagazine.com
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave a comment.