Researchers on the Verge of Creating Artificial
Intelligence/Human Hybrids
By Jake Anderson
There is a longstanding debate among artificial intelligence
experts and futurists: When, not if, AI emerges on the scene, will it help
humanity or destroy it? The scenario has played out through innumerable
iterations in popular culture, the most popular being The Terminator series.
Steven Spielberg, riffing on the film Stanley Kubrick was going to direct
before his death, presented the counterpoint, espousing a benevolent vision of
AI in A.I. Then there are more nuanced, ambiguous iterations, like the recent
Ex Machina.
New advances in algorithmic artificial intelligence, deep
learning software, automation, and nanotechnology have made it abundantly clear
that Ray Kurzweil’s vision of the Singularity may also be not an if, but when.
In fact, responding to Kurzweil’s prediction of a cloud-based neocortex in the
2030s, entrepreneur Bryan Johnson of Braintree said, “Oh, I think it will
happen before that.”
Johnson’s more recent aspirations involve merging artificial
intelligence with humans, a pursuit many would argue is already occurring on a
vast scale when it comes to our use of smartphone technology and search
engines. Johnson thinks it will soon advance far beyond that.
Citing “neuroprosthetics” like cochlear implants, Johnson
envisions BCI (brain-computer interface), a synergistic relationship between
the central nervous system and external computing devices. Johnson’s newest
theoretical prototype is something called a “neural lace,” which is a mesh that
creates a wireless BCI inside the brain that releases certain chemicals as
needed by the end user.
Transhumanist Zoltan Istvan, who actually just finished
running for president, put it more bluntly in an email interview with the
Anti-Media. “This idea that we would create an AI on Planet Earth smarter than
human beings is asinine. There’s no reason to do that unless we want to slit
our own throats,” Zoltan says. “But to use brain implants, neural devices, or
EEG headsets to directly connect to a superior artificial intelligence—yes,
that is something that I implicitly endorse. We need to become one with the
intelligence we create; we need to remain an intrinsic part of it. We must
become the machine by merging directly with it—and that’s what a direct
interface between human brains and AI should be.”
Zoltan, like Hawking and many other thinkers, believes AI
must be introduced to the Earth carefully:
When we flick on
that ‘on’ switch of the first AI that will be superior to us, we must insist we
go along with it for the ride—that we are sitting in the driver’s seat. We can
do this. It will take a Manhattan-sized project to make sure we cross all our
‘t’s, but we can do it. We should insist the smartest of us tap directly into
AI before it fully launches.
I see it like the
sci-fi movie Contact, where the best contenders to meet an alien species
compete for who is the most worthy to be the first one to do it—to represent
the human race to another species. I think in the case of launching the first
true AI smarter than human beings, we should form an international consortium
that will pick the best 12 humans on Planet Earth, and via neural interface,
merge them directly with that AI so we can know the best of the human race is
with it—is hopefully leading it.
Are humans irrevocably evolving toward a deeply entwined,
existential relationship with artificial intelligence? Many of us could find
out in our lifetimes. If Kurzweil, Johnson, Istvan, and more controversial
transhumanists like Peter Thiel are correct, those who find out may be able to
live indefinitely as AI-human hybrids…if such a life proves satisfying.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave a comment.