Meet Britain’s Nuclear Nutcase:
Defense Secretary Micheal Fallon
by John Wight
Michael Fallon’s recent claim that Britain under Theresa
May’s leadership would be willing to launch a preemptive nuclear strike
confirms what many suspected – namely that the British people are being ruled
by a clutch of certifiable fanatics who will get us all destroyed unless they
can be reined in, and soon. The Defence Secretary’s stupendously stupid
statement came in the same week that the BBC’s Andrew Marr asked Labour’s
Jeremy Corbyn in an interview if there were any circumstances in which he would
launch nuclear weapons?
Both taken together suggest that the moral sickness that has
long pervaded the country’s privately educated elite, when it comes to
unleashing wars against poor countries abroad and attacking poor people at
home, has progressed into the realms of actual insanity. Have we seriously now
entered an age when nuclear weapons are considered anything other than an
abomination that no civilized country or non-sociopathic human being would ever
contemplate using for more than a second?
If the likes of Michael Fallon and Andrew Marr are to be
believed, yes we have.
The willingness to trigger armageddon is, in the run-up to
the general election on 8 June, being used as evidence of the Tories’ fitness
to rule. In this regard, Mr Fallon wants us to believe that the British public
are convinced that North Korea and Russia to be more of a threat to its
security than than the Tories are. It really does bespeak ineffable arrogance,
recklessness, and irrationality to wave the prospect of launching nuclear
weapons as part of an electoral strategy. Within this strategy, the inference
that Jeremy Corbyn is weak because he refuses to countenance a first-strike
policy vis-a-vis Britain’s Trident nuclear arsenal, is more confirmation of the
upside down world that these people inhabit. It would be well worthwhile if
Michael Fallon would spare a few minutes to watch the legendary monologue
Charlie Chaplin delivered in his classic 1940 movie, The Great Dictator.
This passage is particularly relevant:
“Greed has
poisoned men’s souls, has barricaded the world with hate, has goose-stepped us
into misery and bloodshed. We have developed speed, but we have shut ourselves
in. Machinery that gives abundance has left us in want. Our knowledge has made
us cynical. Our cleverness, hard and unkind. We think too much and feel too
little. More than machinery we need humanity. More than cleverness we need
kindness and gentleness. Without these qualities, life will be violent and all
will be lost…. “
Predictably, the Defence Secretary’s fatuous boast of being
willing to launch a preemptive nuclear strike did not go down well in Russia.
Franz Klintsevich, a retired colonel and current deputy head of the Russian
Duma, wrote in response that if Britain launched a preemptive nuclear strike
against Russia “it will literally be erased from the face of the earth.”
No one in their right mind could argue that Britain’s
complete annihilation in the event of a nuclear exchange with Russia would not
be guaranteed. Russia currently has 7000 nuclear warheads, while Britain has
215. Russia also has some of the most advanced delivery systems of any
currently in operation, while Britain can’t even get its missiles to fire in
the right direction, given what we know of the failed Trident submarine missile
test that took place off the coast of the United States last year.
By now we are all aware of the role that Madrassas
(religious schools) have played in places such as Pakistan, Afghanistan, and
across the Middle East in radicalising young people with the inculcation of
extremist ideology and fanaticism. In Britain we have our very own version of
Madrassas. We call them public schools – institutions such as Harrow, Eton and
Fettes where maniacs such as Michael Fallon, Boris Johnson, David Cameron, and
Tony Blair are hatched, inculcated with a fanatical belief in British
exceptionalism and imperialism.
With this in mind, surely a political priority for any
future government must be to close these institutions down and reduce them to
rubble. Indeed, nothing less than the survival of future generations depends on
it.
counterpunch.org
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave a comment.