‘What is Love?’ – Why
We Need to Reframe the Big Questions
By Marion McGunnigle
Sometimes, I come across a piece of information, a statement or happening from
around the world that knocks me for six. An event that signals the direction in
which humanity is heading. The sort of harbinger that I like to imagine Orwell,
Huxley or Bradbury used as inspiration. While the media fixes its lens firmly
upon the latest war zone, little alarm bells are ringing in our living rooms.
The Crisis
Of what crisis do these alarm bells warn? Put simply, it’s a
breakdown of human communication. Evaporating emotional intelligence. You’ve
heard it before, but consider it’s impact. It strikes at the core of our being
and leaves us resorting to harmful coping mechanisms. Evidence suggests a
growing trend towards people intellectualising their emotions instead of
feeling them.
The therapists and healers among you will know this is old
news, but it’s a neurosis that’s rapidly evolving.
And then the Divorces.
In 2009, The Guardian reported a growing number of US Lawyers claiming
Facebook [is} a top cause of relationship trouble. "We're coming across it
more and more. One spouse connects online with someone they knew from school.
The person is emotionally available and they start communicating through
Facebook," said Dr Steven Kimmons, a clinical psychologist and marriage
counsellor at Loyola University Medical Centre near Chicago.
Are they really emotionally available or using Social Media
as a means of escape?
The next time you are in a restaurant where couples are
dining of an evening, have a look around and count how many are actively
engaging with one another. When they stare into their smart phones instead of
one another’s eyes, does that signal a healthy connection to social media and
work commitments? Perhaps their relationship is unfulfilling and connection to the tablet or phone seems a
fair substitute. However, is the
permanent connection to the internet actually causing their relationship
issues?
Have they ceased to communicate with one another on a heart
level?
Although we use the term more loosely today, Freud first
theorised intellectualisation as a psychological defence mechanism used by
humans to avoid emotional pain. The interesting point here is that unlike
rationalisation, intellectualisation is a pseudo-rational justification of
irrational acts.
We need only witness the demonisation of entire nations to
glimpse these psychological mechanisms at play. While dehumanisation lies at
the far end of the spectrum, emotional absenteeism is the thin end of the
wedge. It’s a horrible, barren human interplay that has emeshed with family
dysfunction over many years. Smart gadgetry has recently been identified as the
new agent of this dysfunction.
Historically it was the misuse of alcohol and drugs.
The crucial distinction is this: Substance abuse ultimately
kills both human spirit and human bodies. Gadgets can keep us alive, merge with
us, make our lives more convenient until we’re pushed onto the threshold of
transhumanism. So convenient that our opportunity to feel human emotion is
removed. But the need is still there. So convenient that the sacred journeying
of human existence is eliminated. But the child is still within.
I’ve had many conversations with people at dinner parties,
networking groups or with friends on the topic of emotional dysfunction. I
found it striking that so many have discussed the trauma of being raised in an
emotionally barren family. Struggling for years to maintain the false construct
of their lives, they finally “cracked” around their mid thirties, and ran from
the rat-race at one hundred miles an hour. Straight into the consulting room of
a therapist.
I’ve heard it so many times, it’s almost a rite of passage.
But are we repeating the same destructive pattern with the younger generation?
Alarm Bells
On 26th August 2014, The Independent reported on a recent
experiment carried out by scientists at the University of California, Los
Angeles. That study suggested that a heavy use of screens from a young age may
be impairing children’s ability to develop social skills.
“The study,
published online in the journal Computers in Human Behavior, found that a group
of 11 and 12-year-olds who went five days without looking at a smartphone,
television or other digital screen became better at reading human emotions than
a group of their peers who continued to spend hours every day looking at their
devices.”
No surprise there then.
I’ve also heard from shocked friends and parents. A few have
found their primary aged child searching the internet using words picked up
from the playground. Words the parents didn’t think to block and filter. Google
can be a cruel teacher. This is not a reason for censorship, however. It’s a
wake up call to have a human conversation.
A recent party political style video made as part of the
Scottish Referendum campaign depicted a mum stating that her kids “Never have
their heads out their phones.” Is this really the norm in today’s society? It’s
not in my household.
I believe humanity becomes the product of its own behaviour.
Sometimes it’s a good thing. An athlete who trains daily for a long distance
race calls it discipline. For the person who has their behaviour modified
through a process of reward or punishment,
until they associate an action with pleasure or distress, it is
conditioning. When an egocentric parent, partner or sibling uses this tactic
upon a subordinate to exclusively further their own agenda, the seeds for
emotional dysfunction are sown.
When parents are emotionally absent from their children’s
lives, either through alcohol, gadgetry, workaholism or keeping up with the
Jones’, their preoccupations ensure that they set the wrong example. They fail
to teach their children about feelings. They can’t show them what real love
feels like because they don’t know. Kids then look for stimulation elsewhere.
In 2012, Google announced the most searched for term by
humans on planet earth that year. There are over 2 Billion internet users, and
those who used Google in 2012 made 1,873,910,000,000 (One trillion, eight
hundred seventy-three billion, nine hundred and ten million) searches.
For me, that’s an unfathomable number of searches.
Even more unfathomable, then, is Google’s revelation that
the most searched for term that year was:
“What is Love?”
Is that love as a noun or a verb? The definition of an abstract concept is
totally different from human experience of it.
In seeking a definition or explanation, we are looking
outside of ourselves for a the answer. How utterly bizarre to imagine so many
souls across the globe asking a computer, an electrified metal box, to define
love. That was the news that knocked me for six.
And herein lies the problem with gadgetry and it’s harmful
effects upon social skills and emotional intelligence. My friend, Life Coach
and NLP Specialist Colette Reilly suggests the key to solving this problem lies
in reframing it. “The only way to find out what love is, is to have a
conversation with another human being. So, if someone asks, ‘What is love?’,
perhaps we should be responding with, ‘What is love, to you’ and ‘How do you
know you are loved?’ or ‘What makes you feel loved?’”, Colette advises.
Marriage is a commitment. A promise to nourish one another
with our intentions and our actions. It’s a promise to engage and support one
another on the human level, meaning heart as well as head. It’s practising
loving behaviour. It’s finding out what makes your partner and family feel
loved and contributing to that.
When humanity asks a computer “What is love?”, I’m reminded
of this line from Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, “With how many things are we on
the brink of becoming acquainted, if cowardice or carelessness did not restrain
our inquiries.”
So you don’t need to ask a computer about emotions. And why
wait until someone asks you? Go, tonight, and ask your loved ones:
“What makes you feel
loved?”
I guarantee they’ll put down their tablet or mobile, and you
can start being human again.
About the Author
“Marion McGunnigle is
a Creative, an Alternative Thinker, Visionary Healer and Wedding Celebrant
living in Scotland. This article was originally posted on Marion’s website
marionmcgunnigle.co.uk”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave a comment.