Who Really Runs the World?
Conspiracies, Hidden Agendas & the Plan for World
Government
By Andrew Gavin Marshall
So, who runs the world? It’s a question that people have
struggled with since people began to struggle. It’s certainly a question with
many interpretations, and incites answers of many varied perspectives.
Often, it is relegated to the realm of “conspiracy theory,”
in that, those who discuss this question or propose answers to it, are
purveyors of a conspiratorial view of the world. However, it is my intention to
discard the labels, which seek to disprove a position without actually proving
anything to the contrary. One of these labels – “conspiracy theorist” – does
just that: it’s very application to a particular perspective or viewpoint has the
intention of “disproving without proof;” all that is needed is to simply apply
the label.
What I intend to do is analyse the social structure of the
transnational ruling class, the international elite, who together run the
world. This is not a conspiratorial opinion piece, but is an examination of the
socially constructed elite class of people; what is the nature of power, how
does it get used, and who holds it?
A Historical Understanding of Power
In answering the question “Who Runs the World?” we must understand
what positions within society hold the most power, and thus, the answer becomes
clear. If we simply understand this as heads of state, the answer will be
flawed and inaccurate. We must examine the globe as a whole, and the power
structures of the global political economy.
The greatest position of power within the global capitalist
system lies in the authority of money-creation: the central banking system. The
central banking system, originating in 1694 in England, consists of an
international network of central banks that are privately owned by wealthy
shareholders and are granted governmental authority to print and issue a
nation’s currency, and set interest rates, collecting revenue and making profit
through the interest charged. Central banks give loans to both governments and
industries, controlling both simultaneously. The ultimate centre of power in
the central banking system is at the Bank for International Settlements (BIS),
in Basle, Switzerland; which is the central bank to the world’s central banks,
and is also a private bank owned by the world’s central banks.
As Georgetown University history professor Carroll Quigley
wrote:
[T]he powers of
financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create
a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the
political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This
system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the
world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private
meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for
International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and
controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations.
The central banks, and thus the central banking system as a
whole, is a privately owned system in which the major shareholders are powerful
international banking houses. These international banking houses emerged in
tandem with the evolution of the central banking system. The central banking
system first emerged in London, and expanded across Europe with time. With that
expansion, the European banking houses also rose and expanded across the
continent.
The French Revolution resulted with Napoleon coming to
power, who granted the French bankers a central bank of France, which they
privately controlled. It was also out of the French Revolution that one of the
major banking houses of the world emerged, the Rothschilds. Emerging out of a
European Jewish ghetto, the Rothschilds quickly rose to the forefront in
banking, and established banking houses in London, Paris, Frankfurt, Vienna and
Naples, allowing them to profit off of all sides in the Napoleonic wars.
As Carroll Quigley wrote in his monumental Tragedy and Hope,
“The merchant bankers of London had already at hand in 1810-1850 the Stock
Exchange, the Bank of England, and the London money market,” and that:
In time they brought into their financial network the
provincial banking centres, organised as commercial banks and savings banks, as
well as insurance companies, to form all of these into a single financial
system on an international scale which manipulated the quantity and flow of
money so that they were able to influence, if not control, governments on one
side and industries on the other.
At the same time, in the United States, we saw the emergence
of a powerful group of bankers and industrialists, such as the Morgans, Astors,
Vanderbilts, Rockefellers, and Carnegies, and they created massive industrial
monopolies and oligopolies throughout the 19th century. These banking interests
were very close to and allied with the powerful European banking houses.
The European, and particularly the British elites of the
time, were beginning to organise their power in an effort to properly exert
their influence internationally. At this time, European empires were engaging
in the Scramble for Africa, in which nearly the entire continent of Africa,
save Ethiopia, was colonised and carved up by European nations. One notable
imperialist was Cecil Rhodes who made his fortune from diamond and gold mining
in Africa with financial support from the Rothschilds, and “at that time [had]
the biggest concentration of financial capital in the world.”
Cecil Rhodes was also known for his radical views regarding
America, particularly in that he would “talk with total seriousness of ‘the
ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of the
British Empire’.” Rhodes saw himself not simply as a moneymaker, but primarily
as an “empire builder.”
As Carroll Quigley explained, in 1891 three British elites
met with the intent to create a secret society. The three men were Cecil
Rhodes, William T. Stead, a prominent journalist of the day, and Reginald
Baliol Brett, a “friend and confidant of Queen Victoria, and later to be the
most influential adviser of King Edward VII and King George V.” Within this
secret society, “real power was to be exercised by the leader, and a ‘Junta of
Three.’ The leader was to be Rhodes, and the Junta was to be Stead, Brett, and
Alfred Milner.”
The purpose of this secret society, which was later headed
by Alfred Milner, was: “The extension of British rule throughout the world, the
perfecting of a system of emigration from the United Kingdom and of
colonisation by British subjects of all lands wherein the means of livelihood
are attainable by energy, labour, and enterprise… [with] the ultimate recovery
of the United States of America as an integral part of a British Empire.”
[Emphasis added] Essentially, it outlined a British-led cosmopolitical world
order, one global system of governance under British hegemony. Among key
players within this group were the Rothschilds and other banking interests.
After the 1907 banking panic in the US, instigated by JP
Morgan, pressure was placed upon the American political establishment to create
a “stable” banking system. In 1910, a secret meeting of financiers was held on
Jekyll Island, where they planned for the “creation of a National Reserve
Association with fifteen major regions, controlled by a board of commercial
bankers but empowered by the federal government to act like a central bank –
creating money and lending reserves to private banks.”
It was largely Paul M. Warburg, a Wall Street investment
banker, who “had come up with a design for a single central bank [in 1910]. He
called it the United Reserve Bank. From this and his later service on the first
Federal Reserve Board, Warburg has, with some justice, been called the father
of the System.” President Woodrow Wilson followed the plan almost exactly as
outlined by the Wall Street financiers, and added to it the creation of a
Federal Reserve Board in Washington, which the President would appoint.
Thus, true power in the world order was held by international
banking houses, which privately owned the global central banking system,
allowing them to control the credit of nations, and finance and control
governments and industry.
However, though the economic system was firmly in their
control, allowing them to establish influence over finance, they needed to
shape elite ideology accordingly. In effect, what was required was to socially
construct a ruling class, internationally, which would serve their interests.
To do this, these bankers set out to undertake a project of establishing think
tanks to organise elites from politics, economics, academia, media, and the
military into a generally cohesive and controllable ideology.
Constructing a Ruling Class: Rise of the Think Tanks
During World War I, a group of American scholars were tasked
with briefing “Woodrow Wilson about options for the postwar world once the
Kaiser and imperial Germany fell to defeat.” This group was called, “The
Inquiry.” The group advised Wilson mostly through his trusted aide, Col. Edward
M. House, who was Wilson’s “unofficial envoy to Europe during the period
between the outbreak of World War I in 1914 and the intervention by the United
States in 1917,” and was the prime driving force in the Wilson administration
behind the establishment of the Federal Reserve System.
“The Inquiry” laid
the foundations for the creation of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the
most powerful think tank in the US and, “The scholars of the Inquiry helped
draw the borders of post World War I central Europe.” On May 30, 1919, a group
of scholars and diplomats from Britain and the US met at the Hotel Majestic,
where they “proposed a permanent Anglo-American Institute of International
Affairs, with one branch in London, the other in New York.” When the scholars
returned from Paris, they were met with open arms by New York lawyers and
financiers, and together they formed the Council on Foreign Relations in 1921.
The “British diplomats returning from Paris had made great headway in founding
their Royal Institute of International Affairs.” The Anglo-American Institute
envisioned in Paris, with two branches and combined membership was not
feasible, so both the British and American branches retained national
membership, however, they would cooperate closely with one another. They were
referred to, and still are, as “Sister Institutes.”
The Milner Group, the secret society formed by Cecil Rhodes,
“dominated the British delegation to the Peace Conference of 1919; it had a
great deal to do with the formation and management of the League of Nations and
of the system of mandates; it founded the Royal Institute of International
Affairs in 1919 and still controls it.”
newdawnmagazine.com
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave a comment.