Understanding The New World Order -
The Who, What, How and
Why
By Tim Bryant
“A brief glance at
history will tell you that emperors and tyrants have been trying to expand
their power and influence over greater and greater areas for centuries. It just
happens that today it can be done on a global scale like never before…”
A one second search on Google can instantaneously amass up
to 760 million search results on the term “New World Order,” compared to just
719 million for the word “politics.” It seems pretty clear that the concept of
a “New World Order” is not something new, and rather is quite a recognized and
discussed topic within in the world consciousness. In fact, last year there was
even an International Conference on the “New World Order: A Recipe for War or
Peace” that was put together by Dr. Mahathir Mohamad, former Prime Minister of
Malaysia, a post he held for 22 years.
However, just like politics, there is a wide range of
perceptions as to what the phrase “New World Order” even means, and how it’s
reflected in reality. Instead of picking apart every strand and side-tangent of
the theory, it would be more constructive to begin to locate the common ground
which can be held together by easily verifiable information, historical
perspective, and common sense. It’s clear people want to talk about it, so in
order to discuss this illusive concept in a open and mature manner, people have
to begin to let go of preconceived perceptions, even just while you read this
article, and try to look at the evidence in a new, open-minded way. It’s too
important a topic to not at least consider the case…
Defining the New World Order:
A basic definition might be the best place to start, as a
way of laying the foundation for everything else. To do this, let’s first take
a look at a quote by renowned alternative researcher and journalist James
Corbett, when asked what the New World Order is:
“I don’t think
it’s right to frame the New World Order as necessarily a policy or group. I
think it’s more part of an ideology of globalism that has been explicitly
articulated in various ways by various people who are linked, but not always
directly like we might think.”
From the start, it’s important to understand the distinction
that the New World Order is not necessarily one specific group or one specific
law, but more of an over encompassing ideology. An ideology is a worldview and
belief system that guides an individual, group, social movement, class or
institution. The basic concept behind the ideology of a New World Order is
international collectivism, whereas power and law within societies is
increasingly centralized into fewer groups, so as to transcend nations and move
power and law into international bodies and institutions, in the belief that
world law benefits the collective people of the world over decentralized local
law. Therefore, the idea of a New World Order is not simply a single policy,
domestic group, or international organization, but instead encompasses an
international ideological movement towards the construction of a global
governance system. There is no doubt that within this ideology certain patterns
of people, organizations, and tactics continually emerge, over and over again,
to lead the charge. While many are benign to this movement, these same groups and
individuals know what it’s about and frequently refer to the idea of this “New
Word Order” in their writings, speeches, and literature. It is a true
conspiracy for a New World Order of international collectivism that a majority
of the public is not even aware of.
Now this is where many people who have not been exposed to
this theory will check out, as their initial thought plays out like a Hollywood
movie of a secret cabal or authoritarian dictator residing over the world in
his holy throne. However, this is a vastly oversimplified way of looking at an
idea that spans generations in time and is far more complex and nuanced than
many people think. To begin with, the word governance does not necessarily have
the same meaning as government. While government takes the form of a visible
group or organization that is often elected and held accountable, governance
can transcend the nation and operate privately as a stronger layer of power
behind the scenes, which is not always directly visible and often times not
elected or accountable to the public. For example, it is well known that
Cardinal de Richelieu was the “power behind the throne” of King Louis XIII of
France, and similarly today, it’s well known that the Federal Reserve is a
strong “power behind the throne” of the United States Government, with its
autonomous ability to control monetary policy. It’s this concentrated pattern
of power working in the shadows together towards a one-world system in which
most people often refer to in today’s context as “The New World Order.”
In a world of such technological advancement, it shouldn’t
come as a surprise to anyone that there would be an ideological group formed
around the consolidation of international power and control. Any brief glance
at history will tell you that emperors and tyrants have been trying to expand
their power and influence over greater and greater areas for centuries. It just
so happens that today it can be done on a global scale like never before. This
didn’t just fall out of the sky either. Numerous people of high prominence have
openly discussed their vision of a one-world government, while others have
become aware and warned people about the buildup of invisible powers working
together behind the scenes towards further centralization of control. These are
just a few of the many quotes out there by highly recognized figures on the
subject.
“The real rulers
in Washington are invisible, and exercise power from behind the scenes.” –
Felix Frankfurter, Supreme Court Justice, 1952
“Some of the
biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are
afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so
subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had
better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.” –
Woodrow Wilson ,28th President of the United States
“We shall have
World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World
Government will be achieved by consent or conquest.” – James Paul Warburg [son
of Paul Warburg, the author of the Federal Reserve Act] February 7, 1950
“We are grateful
to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great
publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their
promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible
for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights
of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and
prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of
an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national
auto-determination practiced in past centuries.” – David Rockefeller,
Baden-Baden, Germany 1991
“I think that his [Obama’s] task will be to
develop an overall strategy for America in this period, when really a New World
Order can be created.” – Henry Kissinger, CNBC 2008
It seems pretty clear that something is going on behind
closed doors of which many inside the establishment are aware, but are either
part of, or are afraid to talk about. So how does one even begin to put this
all into a rational perspective?
The Concentration of Powers:
The best place to start might be understanding how vast amounts
of private capital found its way into a small group of hands starting in the
late 18th century, especially amongst two leading families, the Rockefellers
and the Rothschild’s. Though there are many other strands of important
information to sort though, a basic understanding of these two massively
powerful interests can give people a glimpse into the strongest powers working
behind the throne to obtain collective world power.
The Rockefellers and Rothschilds are no normal families;
they have privately accumulated assets and powers far greater then that of some
independent nations. An accurate portrayal of history is therefore impossible
to understand without discussing their impact. Their sphere of influence casts
out so far that many of the early international structures established have
their names all over it. John F. Hylan, Mayor of New York from 1918-1925, was
quoted as saying:
“The real menace
of our Republic is the invisible government, which like a giant octopus sprawls
its slimy legs over our cities, states and nation. To depart from mere
generalizations, let me say that at the head of this octopus are the
Rockefeller-Standard Oil interests and a small group of powerful banking houses
generally referred to as the international bankers (Rothschild’s). The little
coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States
government for their own selfish purposes.”
To achieve such power, they both set out and built virtual
monopolies in their respective fields: Rothschilds in banking and Rockefellers
in oil. Starting in the 19th century, the Rothschild’s became the unquestioned
kings of banking, starting a private central bank in almost every country in
Europe. The brothers created an empire through the private lending practice of fractional
reserve banking. As discussed in a previous article, Is the U.S. Dollar Going
to Collapse, this allowed the Rothschild’s to loan out way more money then it
had in its account or in gold to back it up, making them the richest family on
the planet. They amassed a fortune making loans at interest, not only to people
and businesses, but to governments, which in turn gave them unbelievable power,
as they were the main creditor to almost all the governments in Europe. This
was especially effective since governments needed money for war; so as time
went on, these governments became massively indebted to the Rothschild’s. This
wielded them tremendous leverage in politics and world affairs, as they
controlled almost the entire money supply of Europe and could crash the markets
at whim. Baron Nathan de Rothschild once famously said:
“I care not what
puppet is placed on the throne of England to rule the British Empire on which
the sun never sets. The man that controls Britain’s money supply controls the
British Empire, and I control the British money supply.”
Much more here: wakeup-world.com
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave a comment.