Replanting the Wasteland of the Transhuman Agenda
by Ishtar Babilu Dingir
Recently, there was a rivetting and quite dramatic interview
with the writer David Wilcock in which he broke down in tears because he
believed that his life had been threatened over what he planned to expose about
various shady financial machinations of the’global elite’.
The drama of David crying grabbed everyone’s attention, and
also the intervention of an alphabet agency spook with a ludicrous fake Irish
accent trying to reassure David that all the relevant ‘white hats’ had his
back. But there was something else that came out of the “Irishman’s”
contribution, apart from the fact that if he had any theatrical ambitions, he
should definitely not give up his day job. And he said it almost as an aside,
towards the end: “What’s most important here is what’s really at stake: the
fate of the human genome.”
My ears pricked up instantly, because it resonated with what
I’d been finding through my own research into chemtrails and Monsanto, and how
they’re all linked. Because there is definitely an agenda here, by the
powers-that-be (or whatever you want to call them) and that is what’s known as
the Transhuman Agenda.
I know it sounds like something out of a really bad L Ron Hubbard science fiction pulp novel, but it’s true. “They” want to genetically modify us into something that’s more useful to them, just as they did back in the Neolithic period of history, when they created cows from aurochs, and bred us, by social engineering, into the more cow-like submissive creatures we are today.
However, the difference between now and then is that they
now know how to manipulate the human genome itself. Startling evidence about
how they intend to manipulate the human species emerged in a news story last
week about how scientists had developed bullet-proof skin by inserting the silk
of spider milk into the human genome.
These scientists seem to be acting in an ethics vacuum. Even
in the article, there is no mention about how far we should go in making changes
to the human genome, especially when those changes are not in the best
interests of the human being. The only use for this technology would be to
artificially-breed an army of humans with bullet proof skin. Given that the
economies of major Western powers are based on arms dealing, then whose side
are these bullet-proof humans going to be on? Not yours or mine, that we can be
sure of.
It would be interesting to know who funded that research ~
whether it was the Carnegie Institute or the Rockefeller Foundation who are
historically big funders of social engineering projects.
Just as it would be interesting to know why Monsanto now
owns nearly 4,000 patents on processes designed to mitigate the effects of
geo-engineering (chemtrails) on plants, fruits and vegetables, some of them in
partnershp with Mendel biotechnology who specialise in playing around with
genes.
