From Why to How

Fukushima: From Why to How

 by Ida Lawrence

For many years I have held in my heart the question of ‘why’. Why do people do what they do… why is there such great suffering… why are we unable to see ourselves… why do the words not match the deeds… why does life not feel like life… why does love not feel like love.

Of course we all hold why questions, and sometimes we encounter a person who seems to know a bit of an answer. It’s wonderful when words or voices resonate within us, as the sound of truth… yes, I am here with you, all is well, we are in the right place, we met on purpose.

Also some years ago, I took in the question of ‘what is’. What is our lesson of this time, what is our task, what is available to us that we cannot yet see? What is in the spiritual realms, what is our best method of expanding and experiencing the pure information of the divine, and what is Grace?

So, while those questions remain open to new input, I recently added an additional one… ‘how’. If we can get into why, and get into

what is, then how do we manifest a change… a brave world born in wisdom and respect for life?

I’m guessing that quite a few of you may be familiar with Professor Mitsuhei Murata, the former Japanese Ambassador to Switzerland who is an anti-nuclear activist. I recently came across a video of his on the subject of Fukushima, and rather than thinking “This is too heavy, this darkness is too great for me to handle right now; this is so grievous… so unsolvable…” I decided to listen.

By the time I got halfway through the video I was taken with this man’s mind… and his fighting spirit! Toward the end he called on President Obama… and we know that’s a hopeless dream, but the rest of it was very insightful. What impressed me most was his call for ‘Mobilizing Human Wisdom’. It fit with my desire to know the answer to ‘how’.

Regarding Fukushima and the push for nuclear power in Japan, he said, “This is immoral. It shows no sense of international or intergenerational responsibility.”

Then he went on to say something that really strengthened my heart: “Originally Japan had a maternal culture characterized by harmony and solidarity. After the Miji Restoration characterized by competition and confrontation, in May ‘34… history shows that paternal cultures end in catastrophe. Fukushima is the result of the supremacy of economy; another form of paternal culture introduced after WWII. The maternal culture of harmony is the remedy for the paternal culture of power.”

Toward the end of the video, he pointed toward a cause: “Today mankind faces a crisis of civilization. The true cause is lack of ethics.” He envisioned a world without nuclear weapons and reactors… a world with zero possibility of such a disaster, saying that the transition to a maternal civilization is a

prerequisite for this vision.

Okay… this is a man who seems in touch with his feminine polarity, and still very much a masculine person… driven to act not for power and greed, but for wisdom and harmony. Cool… but how to move it forward?

I decided to share the video with a young man in his twenties. He listened intently, and took it in. Then I asked him, “As a man, how would you go about establishing a maternal culture?” His answer… “You have to control yourself… and be aware of how your actions affect everybody around you. Know why you’re doing what you’re doing. What’s the outcome, and what does the outcome say to the future, and what does it say about you?”

Cool answer. It seems there are quite a few young people who are well aware of the responsibility to be ethical. And they take it personally. I’d guess we all know a few, or have influence with a few who have been paying attention. They have a burning desire to tip the scale. I didn’t see any fear in him of a maternal culture, i.e. “I don’t want women taking charge of me”, or “If I take on maternal values I’ll be less of a man.”

We all have both… masculine and feminine polarities… so what’s the fuss. In my view, balance is the answer: balance, and teaching and protecting the youth. They are the ones who will experience the brunt of this sick system, crowned by the Fukushima evil. They are inheriting hell on a heavenly planet. How do we change the world other than by investing in them, and giving them an example of how to be well in a sick world?

Professor Murata said that the true cause of the evil in this ‘civilization’ is a lack of ethics, and if that is so, what has to be gained back first, and taught to the youth? Ethics.

People who love behaving in an ethical way do so because it feels good inside. It is the conditioning and the programming and the deviousness of the system that torments a clean spirit and twists it into compromise after compromise.

Are ethics natural to the human being? I don’t know. Could be that some incarnated to destroy and others to save. But we do know that in a sick world ethics have to be taught and learned… and practiced as a basis for that which is to come, borne on the shoulders of the young.

As I write this, I’m hearing repeated explosions… and music! It’s the Hindu Diwali, the Festival of Lights. Our home is not far away from a beautiful temple. From what I’ve read, Lakshmi, the goddess of fortune, is the main deity honored at the festival.

Our children are the good fortune of the earth… they are the lights. Help them become wise. Mobilizing human wisdom can be done organically, first within self, and then out as far as one light can shine. It will meet others… it will ignite and strengthen the children. In the absence of any other ‘how’, this appears to be our sacred duty.

Fukushima: even this evil the earth and all who love her can overcome.

talk2momz.com

Replanting the Wasteland

Replanting the Wasteland of the Transhuman Agenda

by Ishtar Babilu Dingir

Recently, there was a rivetting and quite dramatic interview with the writer David Wilcock in which he broke down in tears because he believed that his life had been threatened over what he planned to expose about various shady financial machinations of the’global elite’.

The drama of David crying grabbed everyone’s attention, and also the intervention of an alphabet agency spook with a ludicrous fake Irish accent trying to reassure David that all the relevant ‘white hats’ had his back. But there was something else that came out of the “Irishman’s” contribution, apart from the fact that if he had any theatrical ambitions, he should definitely not give up his day job. And he said it almost as an aside, towards the end: “What’s most important here is what’s really at stake: the fate of the human genome.”

My ears pricked up instantly, because it resonated with what I’d been finding through my own research into chemtrails and Monsanto, and how they’re all linked. Because there is definitely an agenda here, by the powers-that-be (or whatever you want to call them) and that is what’s known as the Transhuman Agenda.

I know it sounds like something out of a really bad L Ron Hubbard science fiction pulp novel, but it’s true. “They” want to genetically modify us into something that’s more useful to them, just as they did back in the Neolithic period of history, when they created cows from aurochs, and bred us, by social engineering, into the more cow-like submissive creatures we are today.

However, the difference between now and then is that they now know how to manipulate the human genome itself. Startling evidence about how they intend to manipulate the human species emerged in a news story last week about how scientists had developed bullet-proof skin by inserting the silk of spider milk into the human genome.

These scientists seem to be acting in an ethics vacuum. Even in the article, there is no mention about how far we should go in making changes to the human genome, especially when those changes are not in the best interests of the human being. The only use for this technology would be to artificially-breed an army of humans with bullet proof skin. Given that the economies of major Western powers are based on arms dealing, then whose side are these bullet-proof humans going to be on? Not yours or mine, that we can be sure of.

It would be interesting to know who funded that research ~ whether it was the Carnegie Institute or the Rockefeller Foundation who are historically big funders of social engineering projects.

Just as it would be interesting to know why Monsanto now owns nearly 4,000 patents on processes designed to mitigate the effects of geo-engineering (chemtrails) on plants, fruits and vegetables, some of them in partnershp with Mendel biotechnology who specialise in playing around with genes.